Lions and Tigers and Bears: I am an animal person. Some of you may already know that. I have owned or sheltered or studied all manner of God’s creatures. And I have always been disgusted by cruelty towards animals and the senseless killing of them. So, I am the lead sponsor (along with Raul Grijalva, D-AZ) of the Bear Protection Act. All manner of bears in America have been poached in order to have their gall bladders used for ritual worship in some eastern cultures. The poachers will kill the bear simply for this particular organ, and just leave the rest of it there. The Bear Protection Act would make it a crime to transport certain bear organs across state lines. 33 states already have laws against this practice and this would align federal law and close a loophole through which the poachers continue to slaughter these noble creatures. For you hunters out there, this does not restrict legal hunting in any way. I hope we can get this bill through the House in the next few months. I will keep you posted.

Spending Limit: 43 out of the last 48 years, federal government spending has exceeded federal government revenues. For the… Read More

The FlashReport, Red County, and several other blogs have become information sources for many of us. We read the newspaper (sometimes on line), watch the news, and read blogs. That is the way we get most of our information.

In 1992 I went to work for newly elected Assemblyman Wm. J. "Pete" Knight of Palmdale as his Chief of Staff. Early on in our first year together the Assemblyman distributed a poem to members of the caucus that was viewed as racist. I first found out we had a problem when I heard our scheduling secretary say ,"Sir, Is there anything I can get you for the interview this afternoon with the LA Times?"

The next couple days were terrible. Calls came in from everywhere. They yelled, screamed, and hung upon us.

The one call I will never forget came from someone at the Assembly Republican Caucus that said they were going to keep the articles in the newspaper out of the news clips that morning. Having read all of them as soon as they were available at like 0400 that morning I really did not care but I was relayed this information like it was a favor.

The funny part about the way the situation was handled was… Read More

If your sensitivities are easily offended by very mild off-coloredness (but no foul language), I suggest you don’t read this…or get a sense of humor. If the city attorney’s race and the Sanders vs. Francis mayoral rave-up are San Diego’s center ring attractions this campaign season, the continuing saga of John Hartley has to be the amusing little side show. After all, most folks don’t attend the circus for the clowns alone, but they are funny and do add to the overall spectacle.

If you somehow missed the previous news, former San Diego City Councilman Hartley – vying again for his once-held seat – was arrested a few weeks back during one of his daily precinct walks after some citizens claimed he was urinating into a cup and then masturbating, all while sitting in his vehicle. Enough of that day’s events, but suffice it to say that the resulting jokes and double entendres have been endless.

After a very quiet several days on his part, Hartley came out and admitted a mistake – although… Read More

California’s unemployment rate, which has risen to 6.2%, is now the third highest in the nation (following only behind Michigan and Alaska). This should start some alarm bells ringing in the California State Capitol.

Every legislator, before they vote for any legislation in committee, or on the floor, should be applying a simple litmus test – is this legislation going to create jobs? Will this bill improve our business and job creation climate so that new jobs are created for our unemployed? Will this bill help a small business who is close to closing its doors? If the answers are yes, then the vote should be yes. On the other hand, there are some other questions that can be asked… Would this bill create new regulations or burdens on employers, increasing the likelihood of layoffs or business relocations or closures? Would this bill increase the cost of doing business in California? If the… Read More

California’s unemployment rate, which has risen to 6.2%, is now the third highest in the nation (following only behind Michigan and Alaska). This should start some alarm bells ringing in the California State Capitol.

Every legislator, before they vote for any legislation in committee, or on the floor, should be applying a simple litmus test – is this legislation going to create jobs? Will this bill improve our business and job creation climate so that new jobs are created for our unemployed? Will this bill help a small business who is close to closing its doors? If the answers are yes, then the vote should be yes. On the other hand, there are some other questions that can be asked… Would this bill create new regulations or burdens on employers, increasing the likelihood of layoffs or business relocations or closures? Would this bill increase the cost of doing business in California? If the answers to these… Read More

Remember back in the mid-1990s, when everyone and their mother wanted a piece of the booming communications industry?

Well, the City of Alameda was part of that crowd. But now after a decade, the City’s venture in providing cable TV and Internet services to its residents may come to an end.

According to the San Francisco Chronicle (March 25th), officials from the city-owned Alameda Power & Telecom laid out the options for the public in a presentations to the city’s public utilities board. Unfortunately, none of the options is likely to recover the $85 million the city spent to launch and operate the service.

And, if that isn’t enough, Alameda, which has a general fund budget of $80 million this year, is due to make a $33 million balloon payment next year on the original construction bond for the telecom system.

Girish Balachandran, the utility’s general manager, confirmed that a consultant has been hired to identify and contact parties interested in buying… Read More

Below is the Duncan D. Hunter press release regarding the open 52nd Congressional District. These rounded numbers tell the full money story:

Candidate: Raised 1/1-3/31 / Total Raised / Cash on Hand

Duncan D. Hunter: $278,816 / $503,000 / $263,000

Bob Watkins: $79,268 / $201,000 / $44,000

Brian Jones: $28,243 / $160,000 / $77,000

I haven’t had time to look at, nor do I necessarily care about, any respective debts. The Hunter release (which is all I’ve received thus far):

Duncan D. Hunter Far Outpaces Opponents in Fundraising

(La Mesa, CA) — The Duncan D. Hunter for Congress campaign raised $278,816 during the latest period, out-raising their nearest Primary opponent by over 3 to 1 margin, according to campaign reports filed with the Federal Elections Commission.

"We are very pleased with the strong support we have received from donors, volunteers and voters," said Hunter, who returned late last year from his third tour of duty with the Marines since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

In the period from January… Read More

It seems like nothing makes a liberal more happy and excited than using the coercive powers of government to modify human behavior. Never mind that our Republic was founded on the notions of individual liberty and personal freedom… Democrats in Sacramento are constantly passing bills (hundreds of them each year) that place restrictions, impose fees, provide incentives – all geared towards shifting decision-making away from the individual, and over to the collective – in this case state government.

This election cycle, liberal Democrat Mike Davis of Los Angeles has introduced a classic case of what I call “social engineering” legislation. His bill, AB 2829 would mandate that every large grocery store or pharmacy charge a 25 cent tax on every plastic bag issued to a customer. Davis doesn’t hide his motive – he wants people to stop using plastic bags, and he is going to try to use the coercive power of the government to achieve his goal.

Of course, even though it would smack each shopper with substantial increased costs, this legislation is not called a “tax… Read More