By now most have heard about the remarkable court ruling by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, declaring that the right of “self defense” is a sufficient reason to issue concealed weapon permits in San Diego County (assuming a person is otherwise eligible).
Yes, the ruling could still be overturned (I’m not optimistic the ruling will stand), but it DOES have the saving grace that it supports (and is supported by) the U.S. Constitution. The repercussions if it stands would be statewide — indeed, nationwide.
Perhaps that 2nd Amendment thingy might be considered in any further court deliberations. Hope springs eternal!.
But today’s U-T story on the ruling is annoyingly incomplete, if not outright inaccurate. Many think the U-T is a conservative paper. It is, on the EDITORIAL pages. Not so much in the news department.
Look at their story on this court ruling today. It quotes several sources on how this decision (if upheld) will lead to a more dangerous California.
But what is important is what is NOT reported — it barely mentions that MOST states already operate under this ruling’s criteria — or are even MORE pro-carry than the decision mandates.
Nor does the story report the crime waves in these states resulting from widespread CWP’s issued. Of course, it doesn’t report that, because it doesn’t happen! Never has in a state that liberalizes its concealed carry restrictions.
For example, Texas has issued over 580,000 concealed carry permits. Gun grabbers assume that the result is that Texas is one gigantic “OK corral,” with shootouts over fender benders, bar arguments, etc.
Sadly (for the gun grabbers), the stats say otherwise. FBI stats show that Austin is now the second safest major (over 500K) city in America.
Moreover, in 2011 only 00.2% of the crimes in Texas were committed by concealed carry permit holders, and not all of those crimes involved guns or violence.
Indeed, crime has consistently gone DOWN in such states. Yes, there are other factors affecting crime rates, but gun grabbers would gladly claim more guns = more crime — if only the statistics provided such a correlation.
BTW, aside from the “incomplete” reporting, it’s truly disturbing to read Chief Lansdowne’s warning that “studies have shown gun owners or their family members ae more likely to get shot by their own guns than shoot someone else.”
That aspect has NOTHING to do with the experience of concealed carry OUTSIDE the home, where CWP violence is both rare and often justified. Most of the “in house” gun violence the chief refers to are SUICIDES. Tell me how the right to carry a weapon OUTSIDE the house is going to increase the suicide rate or domestic violence.
Nor does the chief mention that MOST successful defensive gun uses require simply the BRANDISHING of the weapon — over 80% of the time, no shots are fired. And, of course, the robbed, raped and/or murdered defenseless victims don’t figure in the discussion.
I particularly dislike having people “argue from [a position of ] authority” — relying on their title or elevated status to make their ill-reasoned assertions true. Th chief would have been better served if he had:
- Better researched the topic before opining in the matter, OR
- Refrained from commenting all together.
Yes, he has every right to present his viewpoint, but it’s folly to make such foolish assertions without first pondering the issue when indeed one occupies such a position of authority.
This entry was posted
on Friday, February 14th, 2014 at 2:25 pm and is filed under Blog Posts.
