Doesn’t the "I threaten to veto all bills unless" approach get a little old, especially if after the stated threat, one always comes up with a few "except that one" bills that are "too important" to have been lumped in with the rest of the lot?
Just a question.
If, in fact, we could really count on a veto of all pending bills, including the twenty or so terrible ones that Jon Fleischman has been tracking on these pages, perhaps we should actually support a no deal on water for the time being.
Just a thought.
October 8th, 2009 at 12:00 am
Somehow….some way…..me thinks deep in the Terminator’s heart there are populist realisms.
Let this tangent play out…you have so many uninformed and illiterates in California….maybe a massive veto will get their attention.
This state is picked clean by the millions of uncaring moochers who just exist here….turn off the water!
October 10th, 2009 at 12:00 am
Hmmm. I think we’ve heard the same talk before from the Governor…just before he BROKE that pledge by signing into law the Children’s Pool legislation wanted by the enviro lobby.
Fool us once, shame on you, Guv. Fool us twice, shame on us.