We are pleased to offer commentary this morning from longtime FR friend Lanci Izumi. Lance is Senior Director in Education Studies for the Pacific Research Institute. The piece was inspired by the recent headlines about the alarmingly high drop-out rates in California’s public schools…

THE DROPOUT DISASTER: WE TOLD YOU SO By Lance Izumi In 1997, the Pacific Research Institute released the first of its ongoing California Index of Leading Education Indicators, which included a chapter on… Read More

We are pleased to offer commentary this morning from longtime FR friend Lanci Izumi. Lance is Senior Director in Education Studies for the Pacific Research Institute. The piece was inspired by the recent headlines about the alarmingly high drop-out rates in California’s public schools…

THE DROPOUT DISASTER: WE TOLD YOU SO By Lance Izumi

In 1997, the Pacific Research Institute released the first of its ongoing California Index of Leading Education Indicators, which included a chapter on California’s dropout rate. The Index warned that the state Department of Education missed legions of dropouts… Read More

I have had the good pleasure of knowing both George and Sharon Runner going back to long before either was in the State Legislature. As a matter of fact, both were among my supporters back in the mid-90’s in my successful campaign for State President of the California Republican Assembly. At the time, George was President of the Antelope Valley Republican Assembly.

Anyways, I make no bones about the fact that the purpose of the FlashReport is both to promote the conservative cause, and to help my friends.

So when I got a phone call from Senator Runner, asking if I would be interested in having him join the FR blog pen as a legislative correspondent — well, I said yes quicker than you could imagine.

George is a good conservative, and a smart guy. I guess now we will all be able to judge whether, with those qualities as ammunition, he will make a good blogger!

His first post (of many to come) will be on the blog soon. Please welcome to the FR blog Senate Republican Caucus… Read More

I’ve been meaning to add a word here on the decision by the California Supreme Court rejecting, by a narrow, 4-3 vote,a pre-election challenge to the Marriage Amendment on this November’s ballot. Readers will recall that I predicted on June 23 that the Courts would allow the measure to go to the ballot. I said "(w)hile some readers may be disappointed in the Court’s decision earlier over-ruling the ban on same-sex marriages in California, this lawyer predicts the Court will not take the marriage amendment initiative off the November ballot before a vote — at least not yet."

My prediction was based on the strong deference California courts must give to the validity of ballot measures to qualify for the ballot.The right to initiative is a fundamental constitutional right in California.

Now, supporters of the Marriage Amendment need to kick into gear and show the Los Angeles Times and their other liberal opponents thatthe double-digit lead for this measure in the polls is not the "smallmajority" the Times would like it to be.… Read More

We have spent a considerable amount of electronic ink on this page criticizing California Republican Congressman Jerry Lewis (pictured) for embracing the "culture of big spending" that we believe played a large role in the eventual collapse of Congressional Republicans into minority status. Lewis, who served as Chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, and now serves as the top Republican, has a very unsavory attititude about even the most egregious pork earmarks dished up on Capitol Hill — I’ll vote for yours if you vote for mine. That, combined with a rather imperious attitude when in comes to the primacy of "Appropriators" as the dominant class in Congress, make him the kind of Republican that is indistinguishable, most of the time, from a Democrat. (Check out this startling CNN video on Lewis). … Read More

I couldn’t believe it. Pete Wilson and Gray Davis are worried about the impartiality of our court system. They testified recently in front of the Steering Committee of the Statewide Commission for Impartial Courts.

The Committee Chair Supreme Court Justice Ming Chin is concerned that ‘unfair political attacks” on the courts are undermining our democracy.

All three need to look in the mirror before worrying about the courts. Pete Wilson was clear that he would appoint law and order type judges.

Nothing wrong with that?

Gray Davis took it a little further. He actually told a bunch of Governor’s that this:

"They are not there to be independent agents…They are there to reflect the sentiments that I expressed during the campaign.”

If they arrive at a conclusion that differs from the governor, he said, "They shouldn’t be a judge. They should resign."

Then his administration had a pro-abortion, pro-death penalty litmus test for judicial nominees.

Nothing wrong with that?

Judge Chin when first appointed to the bench immediately… Read More

We have spent a considerable amount of electronic ink on this page criticizing California Republican Congressman Jerry Lewis (pictured) for embracing the "culture of big spending" that we believe played a large role in the eventual collapse of Congressional Republicans into minority status. Lewis, who served as Chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, and now serves as the top Republican, has a very unsavory attititude about even the most egregious pork earmarks dished up on Capitol Hill — I’ll vote for yours if you vote for mine. That, combined with a rather imperious attitude when in comes to the primacy of "Appropriators" as the dominant class in Congress, make him the kind of Republican that is indistinguishable, most of the time, from a Democrat. (Check out this startling CNN video on Lewis). … Read More

Today, I alongside Rep. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) announced that we will actively oppose and challenge any attempt to earmark more federal dollars to Chairman Charlie Rangel’s ‘Monument to Me’.

The Washington Post reported yesterday that Chairman Rangel has secured a total of three earmarks for the City College of New York’s proposed Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service, totaling close to $3 million.

Last year I offered an amendment to strike the largest earmark worth $1.95 million for the Charles B. Rangel School Center for Public Service. 316 members voted to allow this earmark to stand. I am interested to see, in the current anti-earmark climate how many of my colleagues will continue to side with this egregious use of taxpayer dollars.

It also should be known that Chairman Rangel has been soliciting donations throughout the business community, touting his status as Chairman of the powerful Ways and Means Committee, which has broad jurisdiction over tax policy, trade, Social Security and Medicare.… Read More