Good Samaritans could get some much needed protection if State Senator John Benoit’s SB39 passes.

… Read More

This morning at 11am, I will be at a press conference being headed up by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, where a group of us are filing a lawsuit today against the illegal action of the state legislature in allowing billions of dollars in potential new tax increases to be passed out of the State Senate and the State Assembly without the 2/3rds vote required under the State Constitution. Joining HJTA and the FlashReport in filing this suit are over 40 State Legislators (Republicans all, of course), the National Federation of Independent Business, Americans for Prosperity, Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner, and KFI radio talk show hosts John Kobylt and Ken Chiampou.

As followers of Golden State politics know, in response to the reasonable and strong position of legislative Republicans that after increasing state spending by over 40% in just four years, our state’s fiscal crisis should not be resolved by punishing Californians and damaging the economy with new tax increases. Legislative Democrats cooked up a scheme to pass billions of dollars in new taxes without any GOP votes… Read More

This morning at 11am, I will be at a press conference being headed up by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, where a group of us are filing a lawsuit today against the illegal action of the state legislature in allowing billions of dollars in potential new tax increases to be passed out of the State Senate and the State Assembly without the 2/3rds vote required under the State Constitution. Joining HJTA and the FlashReport in filing this suit are over 40 State Legislators (Republicans all, of course), the National Federation of Independent Business, Americans for Prosperity, Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner, and KFI radio talk show hosts John Kobylt and Ken Chiampou.

As followers of Golden State politics know, in response to the reasonable and strong position of legislative Republicans that after increasing state spending by over 40% in just four years, our state’s fiscal crisis should not be resolved by punishing Californians and damaging the economy with new tax increases. Legislative Democrats cooked up a scheme to pass billions of dollars in new taxes without any GOP votes trying to use some legal… Read More

Proof that gossip is just that: yesterday I heard the opposite was true, today the financial press has it that Ebay star and ubiquitous McCain spokeswoman Meg Whitman is in the race for California Governor.

The Wall Street Journal blogged on it here, wrote on it here in today’s paper; and the Financial Times has it here.

More later.… Read More

When it comes to this year’s California state budget, there’s really only one question that matters: what’s going to be the price for a tax increase?

Let’s pretend that we can fast-forward past the next few weeks — or several months — of budget foreplay. Let’s assume that the Democratic scheme to pass a tax increase by majority vote doesn’t work, which means that some Republican legislative support will be necessary. Let’s look into the future toward that day when the California state legislature passes a budget by a two-thirds margin for Governor Schwarzenegger to sign.

Assembly Republican Leader Mike Villines has hinted that a package of tax and regulatory incentives that could improve the state’s business climate could be part of a tradeoff for some revenue increases. Because he was careful not to promise such an exchange, Villines was roasted by the state’s mainstream media for intransigence. But while he was not willing to negotiate against himself by offering up absolute assurances of Republican support before any serious discussions had occurred, he was effectively sending a message to… Read More

As many FR readers know one of my hats is as Chair of the CRP Initiatives Committee. I got a call yesterday, after I explained the rumors floating about a referendum should the Democrats and Governor agree on an extra-constitutional majority vote that raises taxes by calling them fees.

I was officially asked by State Senator George Runner to add this item to the CRP Initiatives Committee agenda at the Feb. CRP Convention should such a fee bill be passed. Runner has been working closely with taxpayer groups including the California arm of Americans For Prosperity to lay the groundwork should a referendum be needed.

There is also a Facebook page about stopping the car tax increase part of the proposed deal.

This clearly is a line in the sand. Failure would mean no business, no service and literally no ones pocketbook will be safe. We would live in fear wondering if we were next to be taxed, I mean feeed to death.

For those who emailed me, my kids… Read More

Politics is not like business. Making a deal in business makes sense if everybody makes money on it. Most of the negotiation in business is an attempt to maximize the benefit of a business deal to those trying to negotiate the deal, but in the end, if everyone makes money, the object is to make the deal. A business deal is a win/win deal (or at least perceived to be) or there is no deal

That is not so in government and politics. Political deals are by definition win/lose, or they would be business deals. You don’t have to force someone to do something that will make them money. Force is necessary only when one party or the other perceives that a deal is a loser. Politics involves winners and losers by definition.

That is why this coming year’s budget fight is a critical fight. The winners and losers are easy to define. If taxes are increased the winner is the government, i.e., the government unions and the permanent bureaucracy (the leaders of which actually drafted the budget). The losers are the taxpayers. It is just that simple.

Democrats get it. They want the government unions and the permanent bureaucracy to win.… Read More

[My thanks to Jon for the invitation to blog at the Flashreport. The best thing about the blog format is the chance to have back-and-forth exchanges, so comments on my posts — and emails to me — are encouraged!]

The scare tactics being used to stampede everyone into higher taxes are amazing. By estimating expenditures without reductions and by extrapolating current revenues and then multiplying that by several years, it is possible to declare a budget deficit that is bigger than the budget. The scaremongers are not quite there yet, but they are close. Let’s define the problem.

Revenues were $101 billion dollars a year ago. Despite declines in the economy, state leaders stuck to this number even up to the September enactment of the 2008-09 budget. Now these same people are all shocked and amazed to announce that the revenue for this year will only be $91 billion. Governments are not very good to adjusting income downward (actually, no one likes doing this), but by my math that is roughly a 10% drop in revenues from the prior year. Since there are lots of ways to squeeze 10% out of government spending the simple solution would be to… Read More