Supreme Court case would allow corporate contributions to Federal candidates
Liberal election lawyers are calling "bold and dangerous" and a "potential blockbuster" a brief filed by former Solicitor General Ted Olson on behalf of Citizens United in a Federal election case currently before the U.S. Supreme Court. Citizens United produced a critical film about Hillary Clinton during the presidential election, and marketed it as a commerical venture a la Michael Moore. Regulators didn’t like the idea and Citizens United couldn’t get a court to agree with them that their film should not be subject to Federal Election Commission regulation, such as the ban on corporate funding in any federal election. Now the issue of whether such an activity is an illegal "corporate" expenditure in a Federal election is one of several issues to be decided by the nation’s highest court.
The liberal pro-regulation lawyers are concerned that the Citizens United case might be a basis for the Roberts Court, which has proven itself to be deregulatory-oriented inFirst Amendment/election law cases, to overturn the case of Austin v.… Read More