Posted by James V. Lacy at 12:00 am on Jan 30, 2009 2 Comments
A Federal judge in Sacramento yesterday
ruled against the Yes on 8 Committee’s motion to protect some of
its later donors from public disclosure (due on February 2) because
of a persistent, organized campaign of personal and business
harassment of prior disclosed donors by supporters of gay marriage,
who gleaned the names and addresses of those donors from government
records.
The claims made by Yes on 8 are similar
to constitutional arguments that won the day in prior cases
involving communists and socialists, who claimed they would be
harassed and their privacy rights violated if their names and
addresses were publicly disclosed by the government in connection
with the campaigns of their partys. The Federal Judge in the
Yes on 8 case didn’t agree, even thoughthe claims of the Yes
on 8 committee were stronger than the other established cases, and
supported by real evidence of an organized boycott of businesses
and personal harassment of donors who gave as little as $100.
Liberal election lawyers were happy
with the result, but concerned that Yes on 8 might have some
success by filing an emergency appeal to the Ninth… Read More