Posted by Jon Fleischman at 3:16 pm on Apr 19, 2011 3 Comments
An interesting political drama has been unfolding in the
troubled city of San Diego for several months. The debate centers
around pension reform, and mayoral politics.
On one side, City Councilman Carl DeMaio, a candidate for mayor,
was beating the drums of “comprehensive” reform. He released a
detailed proposal in November that outlined a series of policies
that would flatline the city’s skyrocketing pension
obligations.
On the other side, Mayor Jerry Sanders and Councilman Kevin
Faulconer attempted to tackle the issue with a more moderate
approach that excluded all public safety employees (who make up
half of the pension debt) and allowed pension “spiking” to
continue.
At the peak of the drama, Sanders and Faulconer declared much of
DeMaio’s proposal to be illegal, banned him from participating in
discussions, and then publically released their own proposal. The
media, business community and DeMaio harshly criticized their plan
and forced them back to the negotiating table.
Earlier this month, all three parties released a “unity” ballot
initiative, brokered by the Lincoln Club and San Diego
Taxpayers… Read More