Get free daily email updates

Syndicate this site - RSS

Recent Posts

Blogger Menu

Click here to blog

FlashReport Weblog on California Politics

- Or -
Search blog archive

Ray Haynes

FIGHT SOME MORE

I never like suggesting a course of action without also suggesting a strategy and plan to implement that course. Yesterday, I said fight, and choose a Republican leader who will fight. But “fighting” without a strategy and a plan is simply flailing. Flailing is not fighting, and you can’t fight something with nothing.

I believe we are on the cusp of major changes in California, but those changes will not occur on their own. Republicans will need to be prepared and need to be ready to work to achieve those changes. It won’t happen in one election cycle, it will occur over several, but Republicans need to have a plan to exploit the unease most voters feel about the continuing Democrat majorities. These changes have occurred in other states over time, and came from the same reasons. Voters felt the unease and the Republicans in those states were ready with an agenda and a plan to implement that agenda. Voters were unhappy with Democrats in those states, and Republicans exploited the unhappiness over several elections cycles and ultimately took over those Legislatures.

The first step in taking over any legislative body is to… Read More

Ray Haynes

FIGHT

I read recently that there was an internal discussion in the Assembly Republican Caucus about the direction it should take as the Assembly Republican Leader, James Gallagher, leaves the Legislature next year due to term limits. This is not a new disagreement. Republicans have, for as long as I can remember, always had s discussion about the best way to handle their minority status. Do we fight or do we figure out how to “get things done.” For those who care, I have only one piece of advice that comes from my Legislative experience. My advice?

FIGHT

Always fight, never stop fighting, always look for the Ds political weakness, and exploit them as best you can, fighting with all the energy and resources you can muster.

When I was first elected, I had the opportunity to attend a meeting convened by former State Senator H.L. Richardson. Through the 1960’s, 70’s, 80’s and 90’s, he was the voice of conservatives in California. At the meeting, he took each of us who attended aside for a private meeting. In that meeting, he asked me “What do you think you’re role is in the Legislature?” I said… Read More

Ray Haynes

Toward A Zero Base Budgeting Process, Part II

Let’s refresh what we learned in our Budgetese as a Second Language (BSL) lesson yesterday:

Base – what the government agency spent last year

Budget Change Proposal (BCP) – what the government agency wants to spend this year.

Baseline Budget – the base plus the BCP number

Budget Cuts – Cuts to the Baseline Budget, usually a reduction in the amount requested in the BCP

Line item – each individual BCP request per program

Legislative Action – the vote by the decision makers on the BCP requests.

Now, with that refresher, we are ready to talk about zero base budgeting. Simply stated, a zero base budget process requires the bureaucracy to assume a zero base when it prepares its BCP. What that means is that expenditures for personnel, equipment, logistics, real estate leasing or purchase costs, plus transfers made to accomplish the mission of the bureaucracy are listed in the BCP, and the decision maker, that is, legislator or member of Congress can see everything on which the bureaucracy is spending to accomplish its purpose, not just want they want is the coming… Read More

Ray Haynes

Toward a Zero Base Budget Process

I have to admit, I am really enjoying the DOGE process, and how they have been handling the “obviously” bloated federal government. It has generated a lot of whining by the three million federal employees who feed off the taxpayer all across the country, but it has been a necessary part of bringing the federal government under control, and reducing the extraordinary cost of the continuing expansion of the power and control of those three million federal bureaucrats (not one of whom has been elected). The question is: how do we make these amazing advances permanent?

The answer: Zero Base Budgeting.

What is that, many people ask, how does it work? To understand it, we need to have an understanding about how government budgeting works. I am not familiar with the federal budgeting “language,” but I can guarantee, the process of getting a budget at the federal level is very similar to that used by state government. The words may be different, but the process works the same.

So let’s talk about how the state budget is achieved. The first thing to understand is that government budget types have their own language.… Read More

Bruce Bialosky

A Rare Moment of Clarity from the Left

I read extensively writers arguing their points of view from the left of center. Any experienced reader of mine knows that I believe you must understand what the people believe who occupy the opposing domain to your personal policy beliefs. You must attempt to understand their positions. If you can gain clarity in those positions and still disagree, you are typically in a much better position to argue against them. Recently, their beliefs were unmasked by a noted columnist on a central policy discussion in the public arena. Rare clarity has been provided. As you may know, I don’t think for the most part the Left is evil. I think they are sadly misguided in their analysis of public policy positions. I believe quite often they either omit facts because of their unwillingness to engage people with opposing opinions or their logic is deeply flawed. That is what leads to them expressing their views in nonsensical manners, ala Kammy Harris. On this occasion a major opinion writer at a significant publication explained his thinking regarding Trump’s method of auditing the expenditures at a variety of government agencies and conclusions that were offered… Read More

Bruce Bialosky

A Hole in My Heart

Like most everyone, I too was taken aback by the horrific release of the dead bodies returned to Israel. We knew they were holding dead bodies. We knew this moment would come, but when it came it still staggered the mind and wrenched emotions. I would be sitting, and my mind would drift to the thought of what had just occurred. I would start to cry. In the middle of work or in the middle of lunch or sitting on the couch at home I could not escape the horror, and you begin to wonder how we got to this place. I have read about people acting inhumanely over the centuries. You can’t really classify them as “barbarians.” The word comes from the Greeks and was perpetuated by the Romans to address “the other” — the people who weren’t Greeks or Romans. It has become a word that over the years symbolizes the thoughts of the most uncivilized and brutal people. Attila the Hun and then Genghis Khan were widely known for brutalizing people they conquered. Hamas has no apparent peer rivaling their degenerate behavior. The only thing that comes to mind is the Hutus’ mass murder of Tutsis in Rwanda. They raped and killed women and children in large… Read More

Bruce Bialosky

Why Not? Let’s Give It a Shot

When Trump was campaigning in 2016, he went into many communities that most Republicans did not court. Some of these communities were facing challenges. Those challenges had persisted for years with elected officials making promises to help. The help never arrived. He asked for the vote of the people in those communities with the pitch, “What do you have to lose?” He has applied that philosophy to some public policies and the resistance to the status quo has been like driving a car into a wall. In Trump’s first term, there was hysteria about a proposal he made about tariffs. Trump was attempting to find a method to stop the hollowing out of many jobs in middle America due to trade with China. Since Kissinger and then Nixon went to China the accepted theory was if we opened up China’s society, they would become civilized. It had not worked for 30 years when Bill Clinton proposed they should join the World Trade Organization (WTO). That finally happened on December 11, 2001. This turned out to be a huge mistake. The WTO is an international organization that guides trade between nations. The problem is the organization enabled China, but as it… Read More

Bruce Bialosky

Is There Anything They Would Not Spend Our Money On?

You may have noticed that we had a budget deficit in the last fiscal year of $1.8 trillion. In five years, our annual expenditures increased $2.5 trillion per year. They have never come down from the year of the international pandemic. Yet with the new government in Washington moving toward cuts, one would think an asteroid the size of Mars is headed toward the planet when any budget cuts are mentioned. What are they willing to cut? The non-military federal workforce has increased 30% in the last 25 years. This is an era where private industry companies have cut personnel because of technological advancements. Our population increased 21% during this period of time. The government has grown in all respects yet apparently there is an element of the country that thinks we can’t cut anything despite the staggering numbers laid out above. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has projected that, if we continue on our current trajectory, we will have an annual budget deficit of $2.9 trillion. Raising taxes on the “rich” or “corporations” is not the answer. Revenues keep going up every year, accelerated by the Trump tax plan… Read More

Page 2 of 1,84312345...102030...Last »