Posted by Adam D. Probolsky at 12:00 am on Jul 12, 2006 2 Comments
I voted for it before I voted against it…
More cellular coverage is a good thing and I have voted to
support cel sites whenever they have come before me as an Irvine
Planning Commissioner.
However, last month Sprint had an application before my
commission for 10 ‘repeaters’ in the Turtle Rock area of Irvine (a
hilly community notorious for lacking cel coverage).
Repeaters are much smaller than traditional cel sites. They
are simply appendages that attach to either side of a street light
standard and tie into the local cable company’s fiber optic network
below the street.
The
LA Times had a story a couple weeks ago that indicated that I
had voted against the proposal. In fact, I voted for it,
before I voted against it. Weak, I know. But I had a
good reason.
That night the commission was lacking one commissioner and the
vote was two-to-two. After realizing I was not going to be
able to muster the votes for an approval, I assumed as with any
other 2-2 vote that it would be deemed a denial and the applicant
(Sprint) could appeal the… Read More