Where the heck is McGonigle Canyon?… Not many in SD had heard of this spot a couple of weeks ago, until reports that hundreds of illegals had turned it into a shanty-town, complete with no running water, basic toilet facilities (read: the ground), and even visiting prostitutes. Apparently, local officials have been ignoring it for some time, and the owners of the property have been turning a blind eye as well. A local official was even heard to say, "It’s private property, there’s nothing we can do about it."

Excuse me? Local government can’t do anything about health and safety violations, probable vermin, illegal encampments, sub-standard "housing," prostitution…need I say more? Since when did local bureaucrats become Libertarians?

Apparently, in a politically correct world, anything goes.

Well,… Read More

According to the Sec of State website, the SD 34 was updated Saturday at 5:15 to show that Lou Correa added a few more votes to his lead over Lynn Daucher. Up from 783 to, now, 821.

Lou 55234 Lynn 54413 lead821

Otto Bade 899… Read More

I’m in San Francisco for the weekend. I ran into FR friend Jim Dimartini from Stanislaus County (he’s on the Board of Supervisors there) in front of the Ghiraradelli Chocolate Ice Cream Parlor in Fishermens Wharf.

He shared with me that everyone “back home” is waiting on remaining ballots to be counted to see who will win a seat on the Board of Supervisors there – two Republicans battled it out and less than 30 votes separate the candidates…

With the growing numbers of absentee voters, unless Registrars of Voters around the state significantly beef up operations, this kind of waiting in close races will be the norm…… Read More

Opportunity knocks for the “Reborn Conservatism” touted by Minority Leader John Boehner and his Whip Roy Blunt. There are huge appropriations bills coming up in a lame-duck session before the majority transitions into the minority.

Here’s a grading scale: A: The Appropriations are weeded through, eliminating programs that reflect a fat, bloaded bureaucracy – and all 12,000 or so earmarks are removed.

GRADE: B minus — 12,000 or so earmarks removed, but much fat still in Appropriations bills.

GRADE: D — Republicans pass the buck, pass resolutions to keep the government open, and let the new Democrat Majority deal with it. This would mean failing to use the opportunity to prove their new rhetoric.

GRADE: F — Republicans are all talk and approve the massive spending packages that include the earmarks.

The significance of an A grade, or even the B- are important. You see, one of the major underlying factors that has led the GOP to growing government has been the influnce of the lobbyists (called “K Street” because so many lobbyist have offices there). Each of those thousands of… Read More

Like FR Publisher Jon Fleischman, I am profoundly disappointed that House Republicans essentially chose to tell the American people with yesterday’s leadership vote, ‘We don’t need to change. This is who we are.’ They reaffirmed their support for a leadership team that did little, if anything, to advance responsible conservative fiscal policies and taxpayer rights, that had so few big accomplishments (Social Security reform?) that its message was consistently trumped by scandal after scandal, and that lost control in such a big way.

Jon is absolutely correct when he writes:

Why would anyone believe that if Republicans took back the majority, things would be appreciably different than before, with the same leadership? I’ll be looking to see if Republicans get very specific about what they did wrong, what specifically they would change if back in power? A very real first step would be to completely change out all of the Appropriations Committee members (how about making… Read More

Like FR Publisher Jon Fleischman, I am profoundly disappointed that House Republicans essentially chose to tell the American people with yesterday’s leadership vote, ‘We don’t need to change. This is who we are.’ They reaffirmed their support for a leadership team that did little, if anything, to advance responsible conservative fiscal policies and taxpayer rights, that had so few big accomplishments (Social Security reform?) that its message was consistently trumped by scandal after scandal, and that lost control in such a big way.

Jon is absolutely correct when he writes: Why would anyone believe that if Republicans took back the majority, things would be appreciably different than before, with the same leadership? I’ll be looking to see if Republicans get very specific about what they did wrong, what specifically they would change if back in power? A very real first step would be to completely change out all of… Read More

I know I am starting to sound like I am beating the same drum over and over. But I am still reflecting with wonder on the fact that earlier today House Republicans gathered in a room and largely re-elected the same leadership that they had while in the majority.

The gravity of the problem for House Republicans is highlighted by my reaction to reading a speech I found online given by Roy Blunt (right), who was re-elected into House Leadership. In it he gives a speech that makes it sound as if he suddenly has turned over a new leaf. This the man who for years literally whipped up the votes to massively grow government. Now, stripped of his majority status and power, he is giving lip service to past mistakes.

Why would anyone believe that if Republicans took back the majority, things would be appreciably different than before, with the same leadership?… Read More

Senator Ackerman sent me the latest numbers, not so good for Reps. Lou has pulled out to a 783 vote lead, a little less than the Otto Bade write-in number of yesterday, 800+ votes. These seem to be all provisional day-of ballots. If they were still the absentees it would be better. 55147-54364, advantage Lou.… Read More