Get free daily email updates

Syndicate this site - RSS

Recent Posts

Blogger Menu

Click here to blog

FlashReport Weblog on California Politics

- Or -
Search blog archive

James V. Lacy

Criminalizing the Constitution sadly not just a problem in Newport Beach

Some of the hallway discussions at CPAC have focused on the plight of Paul Jacobs, a leading light andpromoter ofterm limits. Jacobs, a founder of the organization U.S. Term Limits, was a leading candidate for the so-called "Ronald Reagan" award, which is an annual cash prize bestowed on an exemplary conservative by the American Conservative Union Board of Directors at CPAC. This year’s winner will be announced at a dinner tonight.

Jacobs has allied with Californians more than once to promote and preserve term limits through initiatives.

Sadly, Jabobs efforts are not so appreciated in Oklahoma. He is currently under criminal indictment in the Sooner State for importing "out of state" petition gatherers to work on a state spending limit initiative. Criminal indictment.

Professional petition gathering is not a pretty business. It is not easy to find a person willing to volunteer to faceexposure andrejection 2 or 3 times a minute. The people who charge for these services and actually enjoy it are rare and a special type of person. Often, in a successful petition gathering… Read More

James V. Lacy

The Romney Speech at CPAC

I have been surveying tried-and-true conservatives on their reactions to the McCain speech at CPAC in Washington, D.C. yesterday, and to be honest, most want to talk about the Romney speech earlier in the day, in which Romney announcedhe was "suspending" his campaign, and not the McCain speech.

Gary Kreep of Ramona, CA, the President of the US Justice Foundation and a CPAC "old-hand" summed up the comments I am receiving. He told me this afternoon, "Romney sounded like he was running for President in 2012." Even though Romneymade it plain that the time for a Republican president was now.

I took a second to take that in, and then said, "well, do you think Romney is supportive of McCain in 2008?" And Gary answered, "yes, but my feeling is the speech was about him, not McCain, and that he is running in 2012."

Interesting.

I have had opportunity to commune with a whole lot of people. My friend Lew Uhler, who I have worked with many times, the extremely intelligent lawyer Joe Morris of Chicago, who was Don Devine’s General Counsel at the U.S. Personnel Management… Read More

James V. Lacy

CPAC tidbits

Here are a few itemsfrom the Conservative Political Action Conference, being held this weekend at the Omni Shoreham Hotel in Washington, D.C……

Total paid registrations as of noon today: 6,800, and still coming. The total for last year, which was the highest ever, was 6,400.

Total credentialed media in attendance: 500.

Number of co-sponsoring organizations: 90.

The Conservative Movement is the biggest it has ever been.

Last Fall CPAC and the hosting American Conservative Union prepared a questionnaire for all the Republican Presidential candidates and asked for responses bylate last year so the information could be distributed at this CPAC. John McCain, and all the other candidates responded in detail,with just one exception. By a letter dated December 7, 2007, California’s Bill Simon, identified as "policy director" for the Rudy Giuliani campaign, on the campaign’s stationary, informed CPAC/ACU that the Giuliani campaign would not be responding to the questionnaire, and had a policy against responding to all questionnaires because of the shear volume of work.… Read More

James V. Lacy

Bush “stunned” by positive response at CPAC

President Bush delivered a tremendous speechthis morningbefore a very large crowd, several thousand, of highly enthusiasticactivists at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C. The crowd wildlysupported references to the war on terrorism policy.

The Washington Post had reported this morning excerpts of the President’s planned speech, which were distributed to some reporters last night,andincluded verbiage generally supportive of McCain’s quest to wrap-up the Presidential nomination very soon. The Post had suggested in the story that Bush’s speech was an attempt to shore-up support for closing down the nomination in favor of McCain. The real story was not exactly that. Bush hit on the heartstrings of the crowd, discussed his accomplishments, the crowd responded extremely well, and, according to long-time CPAC staffer Tish Leonard, Bush ended his speech "stunned" at the highly supportive response he received. The White House must be thinking now, after the speech, of missed opportunities to rally the troops in past years with the loyal conservatives here at… Read More

Jon Fleischman

Today’s Commentary: CalChamber Goes 7 For 7 On Tuesday — Impressive

As I was reflected on the results of how all of the ballot measures fared in last Tuesday’s election, I was struck with a sense of déjà vu. No on 91. No on 92. No on 93. Yes on 94. Yes on 95. Yes on 96. Yes on 97. Then it struck me, and I looked back through my e-mails and sure enough, the California Chamber of Commerce put out a release urging ALL of these positions. Or, to put it another way, the CalChamber went seven for seven, or 100% on election day! All of the measures either passed or failed by pretty wide margins on Tuesday, with the exception of Proposition 93, that was so close that newspapers had to go to print for Wednesday morning without a definitive answer on whether it passed or failed.

Relative to that close measure… **There is more – click the link**Read More

Jon Fleischman

CalChamber Goes 7 For 7 On Tuesday — Impressive

As I was reflected on the results of how all of the ballot measures fared in last Tuesday’s election, I was struck with a sense of déjà vu. No on 91. No on 92. No on 93. Yes on 94. Yes on 95. Yes on 96. Yes on 97. Then it struck me, and I looked back through my e-mails and sure enough, the California Chamber of Commerce put out a release urging ALL of these positions. Or, to put it another way, the CalChamber went seven for seven, or 100% on election day! All of the measures either passed or failed by pretty wide margins on Tuesday, with the exception of Proposition 93, that was so close that newspapers had to go to print for Wednesday morning without a definitive answer on whether it passed or failed.

Relative to that close measure… There is no doubt that in the hotly charged effort by legislative leaders to extend their own terms, the Chamber’s opposition to Prop. 93 made a big difference. No doubt… Read More

James V. Lacy

President Bush to speak at CPAC today (and my secret CPAC George W. Bush story)

President George W. Bush will speak at 10:20 am this morning at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C., his first appearance at the annual conference as President.

During his presidency, Ronald Reagan attended every CPAC conference in person, with the exception of one, and he sent a recordedmessage to that one. He also was a frequent visitor before his election.

I can personally verify, however, that George W. Bush has been to more CPACs than just the one he is attending today, where he is certain to receive a rousing welcome and support for the troop surge in Iraq.

It was the 1988 CPAC conference. However, George W. Bush was not a speaker, rather, he was an on-sitebehind the scenesobserver of a sort of"monitoring" operation on Jack Kemp’s campaign activities at CPAC,as his father, Vice-President George H. W. Bush and Kemp were sparing for the 1988 Presidential nomination, and conservative support, in the process that would ultimately be won by George H.W. I know because I was there…..

My friendCraig Shirley was running the operation, with plausible… Read More

Jim Battin

Waste Watch – San Francisco Board Gets More Money, Less Credibility

Sometimes taxpayers vote to spend more money for better government, but actually get the opposite.For example, San Francisco residents voted to pay their Board of Supervisors $60,000 more a year to compensate the board for meeting on a nearly full-time schedule. The supervisors convinced San Francisco voters that full-time pay would allow them to devote even more time to the job. Voters approved the raise, thinking the supervisors would be more productive and improve the city.But, after six years, the only improvements that have been made are to the board members’ bank accounts. The San Francisco Chronicle (January 30, 2008) reported that "[e]ver since members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors persuaded voters to pay them like full-time government workers, the city’s lawmakers have been holding fewer meetings to debate and pass legislation."Read More