
The “I promise to be a Spendthrift” Pledge
I am always fascinated by what is described as a "compromise" in politics. Is it a compromise when the Democrats demand a bad policy, and they get some of it? It’s still bad, and saying no to bad policy is not being "unreasonable." More important, saying yes to a bad policy is not being "reasonable." A bad policy is a bad policy, and a leader says no to a bad policy, no matter what the political consequences
Second, did the Democrats sign an "I promise to be a Spendthrift" Pledge? I mean, they increase spending every year, and they claim that any reduction in that increase is a "cut." The budget in 2002-03 was $77.4 billion, $78.3 billion in 03-04, $79.8 billion in 04-05 (the last three years of the last budget crisis) and $91.6 billion in 05-06, $101.4 billion in 06-07, and $103.4 billion last year. Yet in each of those years, Democrats screamed about "cuts" in spending. More important, if you look at special fund spending during that same time, it has grown from $20.5 billion in 01-02 to $41.9 billion in 06-07. After the Sinclair Paint decision, state bureaucrats have been shifting… Read More