
RNC Second Ballot
RNC Second ballot result:
Duncan 48. Steele 48. Dawson 29. Anuzis 24. Blackwell 19.
85 votes needed to win.
15 minute recess before next vote.… Read More
- Or -
Search blog archive
RNC Second ballot result:
Duncan 48. Steele 48. Dawson 29. Anuzis 24. Blackwell 19.
85 votes needed to win.
15 minute recess before next vote.… Read More
After the third round of voting (see results in the post below this one), RNC Chairman Mike "I said absolutely nothing about the bailouts of wall street and the automakers" Duncan is OUT — he was withdrawn from the race.
As to how his votes end up divvying up among the others?
The fourth ballot: Dawson 62 Steele 60 Anuzis 31 Blackwell 15
85 needed to win.… Read More
Ordinarily, I’m not one to get much excited about news involving the party-out-power this soon after a presidential election. Finding out who’s keynoting the Iowa Republican Party’s Lincoln Dinner, for example, is about as earth-shattering as new of, oh,the Dodgers’ new Assistant G.M. Newsworthy? Yes. Will we be talking about it a year from now? Not likely.
That said, it’s worth taking a moment to reflect onthe news out of Washington: the selection of Michael Steele as chairman of the Republican National Committee.
The choice was not just historic — Steele being the GOP’s first Africa-American chair, chosen less than weeks after the swearing-in of the nation’s first African-American president. It could turn out to be an important early step in digging the GOP out of its current bind as the nation’s minority party.
Off the top of my head, here are four reasons why Steele seems the right choice:
1) He’s battle-tested Steele twice sought statewide office in Maryland — winning a race for Lieutenant Governor (making him, at the time, the nation’s highest-ranked… Read More
Steele 79.
Dawson 69.
Anuzis 20.
After the results were announced, Anuzis dropped out, endorsing no one. 85 votes needed to win — the next ballot is probably it…… Read More
A Federal judge in Sacramento yesterday ruled against the Yes on 8 Committee’s motion to protect some of its later donors from public disclosure (due on February 2) because of a persistent, organized campaign of personal and business harassment of prior disclosed donors by supporters of gay marriage, who gleaned the names and addresses of those donors from government records.
The claims made by Yes on 8 are similar to constitutional arguments that won the day in prior cases involving communists and socialists, who claimed they would be harassed and their privacy rights violated if their names and addresses were publicly disclosed by the government in connection with the campaigns of their partys. The Federal Judge in the Yes on 8 case didn’t agree, even thoughthe claims of the Yes on 8 committee were stronger than the other established cases, and supported by real evidence of an organized boycott of businesses and personal harassment of donors who gave as little as $100.
Liberal election lawyers were happy with the result, but concerned that Yes on 8 might have some success by filing an emergency appeal to the Ninth… Read More
On the sixth ballot, we finally have a winner. With a vote of 91 (a majority), we extend congratulations to Chairman Michael Steele!
The challenges before the party are great, and no one person can do it all — but Steele will play a key role in leading our party, and preparing us for our march out of the wilderness.… Read More