Plastered all over the news today are stories about 10,000 layoffs in the State workforce. That might be signficant, but can it be understood on it own? No.

We need to ask: how many employees, new, were hired by the State since 2004. I have heard the number 50,000 thrown around as the answer, but I don’t know. But if it is, then we are still 40,000 higher than we were, and it unlikely that anyone can put up a rationale defense that we needed the extra (insert number) of employees.… Read More

The system is beyond broken up Sacramento. The “Big 5” negotiate behind closed doors. Then they go present deals to their respective caucuses behind closed doors. It is certainly my hope that the next step in the process is that the legislators then leave their caucuses to their constituents, and to those public policy and political experts in whom place trust, before deciding to support or oppose a deal. I am sure I speak for a great many from the right, left and center when I say that a proposal of this magnitude should be a very considered one, and one where we can talk to our representatives when it matters, not after a deal (good or bad) is done.… Read More

This just off the transom from State Senator Dennis Hollingsworth:

“The tentative deal reported in the Sacramento Bee today, if supported by Republicans will be a disaster for all Californians, the state budget and for Republicans as a party. Punishing every Californian by increasing their taxes, especially in a time such as this, is not only wrong-headed for the economy, it is simply morally wrong to demand the people reach deeper into their wallets in order to continue to fuel the spending of state government. If this passes with Republican votes, there will be no reason for any Californian to vote for a Republican in the future. The people sent Republicans to Sacramento to be a blockade against tax increases. Once that wall crumbles, the will … Read More

Although this Californian may be more dramatic in his expression of frustration, I think many Californians canunderstand how he feels, especially when it comes to government’s unresponsiveness. We just want to be heard. … Read More

Readers of my periodic Rants know that I have been highly critical of the way the Bush Administration and Republicans in Congress spent their way to ignominy in the past few years. Like crack-addicted junkies, it seemed like the answer to virtually every problem was more federal spending. When the economy began to slow in 2007, we had the first economic stimulus plan that was based on the brilliant economic principle of giving “targeted” tax refunds to millions of people who didn’t pay taxes in the first place. We were told that this federal spending was necessary to help consumers inject billions into the economy, thus saving jobs and preventing a recession. The stock market was at 12,337 when the first stimulus plan passed a year ago this week to great fanfare. By July it was down by 11 percent to 10,997. Next came the bailout of various financial institutions with the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). This was a $700 billion boondoggle based on the same flawed logic of the stimulus – since the stimulus plan didn’t work to actually stimulate the economy, let’s do more of it. Passing TARP was essential, we were told, to stabilize the nation’s financial… Read More

This just in from longtime FR friend Jamie Fisfis over at Chariot Research, a respected public opinion research company from the Bay Area that actually does quite a bit of world all over the globe. They are just out of the field with some survey data on California issues, and I think that the results are definitely worth looking over in the context of the current debate in Sacramento over how to deal with the financial shortfalls due to chronic overspending.

From Fisfis:

Chariot LLC just completed another statewide omnibus survey and the budget debate was one of our main focuses. We have fresh budget debate numbers and they are pretty decisive on the issue of how Californians want the crisis solved. By a 63%-25% margin, Californians believe in spending cuts rather than tax increases to solve the budget crisis – even when education is mentioned specifically. … Read More

If you have been involved in multiple battles, statewide or local, to oppose taxes on the ballot, then you know that it is significantly more difficult to defeat measures that “seek to extend the life of an existing tax” than it is to stop the creation of a new tax.

Legislators flirting with the idea of voting to increase taxes “temporarily” (my good friend Assemblyman Martin Garrick can remind any legislators of the fallacy of raising taxes now, temporary or not) need to keep in mind that once it is created, there is a very good likelyhood that it will eventually become permanent.… Read More

I know people like rumors so here is one.

In Southern California the whole KFI John and Ken Show and their campaign against some Republicans keeps coming up. There isn’t a meeting I go to someone doesn’t talk about it.

It appears to have gotten the attention for former State Senator Dick Mountjoy. Mountjoy conveyed to me he was thinking of running for Assembly in 2010. He was really upset about Republicans voting to raise taxes.

Of course I relayed that no one has voted to raise anything at this point.

Dick has one more term left in the Assembly. The Democrats kicked him out of the State Assembly in 1994. Mountjoy had been elected at the same time in a special election to the State Senate, but stayed in the lower house to try to help the Assembly Republican keep their majority. (Remember Paul Horcher?)

In that GOP Senate Primary he beat Horcher and future Assemblyman and Congressman Gary Miller despite being outspent.

Mountjoy represented half of the current 59th (Monrovia, Glendora etc..)as a State Assemblyman and State Senator. He lost a bid as the GOP nominee for U.S.… Read More