Maybe it was the octuplet mother inciting public backlash, or Nancy Pelosi’s warpedthinking that preventing future productive members of society will help us out of our current economic meltdown. Whatever the reason, stateleaders have decided that parents should no longer receive tax benefits for growing their families. Included in their budget “deal” is a decrease in the dependent exemption credit. Kevin Dayton over at the Associated Builders and Contractors of California first brought this to my attention in an email. He explained that part of the budget deal was the plan to “raise $1.44 billion by increasing taxes at least $210 per dependent by reducing the dependent exemption credit to equal the personal exemption credit.”

Kevin made a great point about the exemption so I’m just going to quote him directly: “The proposed budget makes it sound so nice – ‘equalizing the credit’ – as if justice was… Read More

This just off the transom from State Senator Dennis Hollingsworth:

Although this Californian may be more dramatic in his expression of frustration, I think many Californians canunderstand how he feels, especially when it comes to government’s unresponsiveness. We just want to be heard. … Read More

Readers of my periodic Rants know that I have been highly critical of the way the Bush Administration and Republicans in Congress spent their way to ignominy in the past few years. Like crack-addicted junkies, it seemed like the answer to virtually every problem was more federal spending. When the economy began to slow in 2007, we had the first economic stimulus plan that was based on the brilliant economic principle of giving “targeted” tax refunds to millions of people who didn’t pay taxes in the first place. We were told that this federal spending was necessary to help consumers inject billions into the economy, thus saving jobs and preventing a recession. The stock market was at 12,337 when the first stimulus plan passed a year ago this week to great fanfare. By July it was down by 11 percent to 10,997. Next came the bailout of various financial institutions with the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). This was a $700 billion boondoggle based on the same flawed logic of the stimulus – since the stimulus plan didn’t work to actually stimulate the economy, let’s do more of it. Passing TARP was essential, we were told, to stabilize the nation’s financial… Read More

Yes, you read that title correctly. According to a piece by John Simerman in yesterday’s Valley Times, the state spent $22 million to help sex offenders pay their rent in 2008. In some cases, the payout to individuals was over $2,000 per month. This money was evidently spent to help the parolees abide by Prop. 83, Jessica’s Law. By that same logic, we should be spending millions for paroled thieves to give them everything they want, so they won’t steal anymore. And while we’re at it, perhaps we should spend a few mil on cocaine and give it to paroled drug offenders so they won’t have to buy it and get in trouble.

Since when did the government bear the burden of paying for people to comply with the law? The government didn’t pay for my last speeding ticket, or give me vouchers for taxis so that I couldn’t possibly break the law by driving myself anymore.

I am astounded that someone receiving a taxpayer subsidized salary thought that those same taxpayers should pay for some creepy… Read More

Remember back in 1995, when GOP Assemblywoman Doris Allen denied her fellow Republicans control of the Assembly by allowing the Democrats to make her Assembly Speaker?

The same thing has has happened to Tennessee Republicans, per today’s Political Diary:

Tennessee Republicans may soon find out if the public thinks a willingness to relinquish political power on principle is a reason that Republicans ought to be trusted with more power down the road. In effect, the Tennessee GOP has denied itself the speakership of the State House by kicking the speaker out of the Republican Party.

Here’s the backstory: In November, the GOP won control of both houses of the state legislature for the first time since Reconstruction. That victory was one of the few bright spots for Republicans across the country in 2008 and seemed to set the stage for a GOP resurgence and possible capture of the governor’s mansion in 2010. Then, on Jan. 13, the wheels started to come off. Republicans had rallied behind Rep. Jason Mumpower for House Speaker, and he appeared to… Read More

No… It wasn’t us. It was the Los Angeles Times (or as former Congressman Chris Cox like to refer to them, Pravda West).

Breaking her long self-imposed silence on many state policy issues while she was "considering" a run for Governor, Meg Whitman, now officially a candidate, gave an interview to Michael Finnigan with the Los Angeles Times. The interview is worth reading, although I must admit that after reading it with the idea that an interview might actually clear up a lot of the "mystery" surrounding Whitman and her positions on major issues of the day. Instead, I found that the interview left me with a lot of questions.

I have my own request into the Whitman campaign talk with the ersatz Governor, and haven’t heard back yet. I actually had assumed that Whitman was not doing interviews, yet. Clearly she wanted to give an exclusive "first interview as a candidate" to a major California newspaper. Conservative blogger interviews are somewhere down the journalistic food… Read More

What suicidal impulse would lead any Republican legislator to believe it is a good for either California taxpayers or the California Republican Party to support: Raising the sales tax by an additional 1%? Nearly doubling the vehicle license fee? Raising income taxes? Spiking the gas tax by 12 cents per gallon?

Honestly, any Republican legislator who votes for this deal ought to re-register as a Democrat, because making the problem worse — which is what this deal will do — is an activity best left to legislators of that persuasion.

I saw somewhere today where Governor Schwarzenegger’s spokesman, Aaron McLear, claimed the "state is running out of money."

This is simply, manifestly untrue. It’s a fib, a fable. The state of California rakes in an absolutely enormous amount of money each and every year. The size of the ginormous haul gets bigger every year. in fact, the amount of tax revenues for this year was sufficient to fund the state budget just two short years ago.

Obviously, logically, the problem… Read More