It didn’t take long for split roll property tax advocates to make their way into the headlines. Bottom line–split roll property tax and any similar tinkering with Proposition 13 will kill jobs in California. Below is a recent op ed I wrote for the North County Times on the subject:

Forum: Split-roll property tax proposal a job killer By NATHAN FLETCHER — 75th District assemblyman

In a crisis a lot of new ideas are put on the table. Many of these are welcomed additions to the debate. I’m particularly fond of new ways to make government work better-more accountably, more efficiently, and more transparently. There are some reform proposals that focus on using technology to open up state government for review and reorganization. There are other ideas for structural change-two-year performance-based budgets, term limit changes, instituting a part-time legislature, even calls for a constitutional convention. I have read about some cutting-edge steps to once again make California a competitive place to start and grow a business and to create jobs. All of these ideas have merit… Read More

I’d guess that a few readers of the Flashreport flip straight to the blog page in the morning, me among them. One opinion piece, written by Orange County Congressman Ed Royce, is an example of why the front page is worth reading. Congressman Royce’s column addresses TARP repayments, and the attempt by Congressional Democrats to siphon some of this money off to organizations like ACORN. In effect, this siphoning amounts to patronage for leftist ‘nonprofits’ that are another wing of the Democrat machine… taxpayers paying to help the Democrats maintain a majority. It’s a ‘must read’ – click back to the homepage and rub your eyes on it.… Read More

I am not going to tear into any particular legislation in this brief blog-rant, but in the last few weeks, as I have reached out to Republican legislators to ask them why they have authored, support, or have voted for legislation that increases regulation on a particular business or industry — I have heard the same excuse back — "The industry wants this regulation."

You know what I have to say to that excuse? Tough beans for them. Just because representatives from a particular type of businesses want to be regulated does not mean that they should be. Legislators should take into account factual information about the effects of regulations into account when examining a bill, but the number one question that should always be asked when considering a potential regulation is this: "Is this regulation absolutely necessary?"

In many cases, when "industry leaders" are looking for regulation of their own industry, it is for self-serving reasons. Perhaps it is to impose standards which they like but which then stifle competition as it may keep others who may not meet the same standards from taking some of their… Read More

Last week the San Francisco Chronicle published a story in which they “broke the story” that former Hewlett Packard Chief Operating Officer and ersatz United States Senator Carly Fiorina may not have complied with required government filings concerning two business entities which she owns – Carly Fiorina Enterprises and the Fiorina Foundation.

Fiorina, who has been prepping behind the scenes for a run for the Republican nomination for United States Senate next year – even as she undergoes treatments for breast cancer – was quick to respond to the allegations through her spokesman and Chief of Staff Deborah Bowker. Bowker contacted me with the following statement…

In the coming weeks, every kind of commentator from every corner of the state is going to have a recommendation about how to solve the budget crisis. Democrats are going to pound their chest and say they won’t "cut" government any more. Thousands of articles are going to be written attacking Republicans for being obstructionists (and that will be the nicest things they say), everyone is going to have a solution, an idea, a comment, a thought, every kind of way of "solving" the crisis, most of which will tell legislators that they have to "leave their ideology" at the capitol steps, and become "problem-solvers." These are media speak for "Republicans have to raise taxes."

In my opinion, there is only one strategy that will actually solve this crisis, and the crises that will occur in the future. Republicans must stand firm. I realize that is asking a lot. Republicans have never stood firm. Republicans have always given in. Republicans in the Legislature are as responsible for today’s collapse because past leaders have given in to Democrat demands for bigger government, and have never stood up… Read More

Last week the San Francisco Chronicle published a story in which they “broke the story” that former Hewlett Packard Chief Operating Officer and ersatz United States Senator Carly Fiorina may not have complied with required government filings concerning two business entities which she owns – Carly Fiorina Enterprises and the Fiorina Foundation.

Fiorina, who has been prepping behind the scenes for a run for the Republican nomination for United States Senate next year – even as she undergoes treatments for breast cancer – was quick to respond to the allegations through her spokesman and Chief of Staff Deborah Bowker. Bowker contacted me with the following statement…

Adding significant muscle to a bill that appeared to have some legs already, State Controller John Chiang on Friday sent a letter to Assemblyman Joel Anderson in support of AB 1506. The Anderson legislation, a badly-needed piece of creative juice in the midst of another protracted State budget mess, would require the State of California to accept as payment its own registered warrants, otherwise known as IOUs.

Quite simply, for Controller Chiang to support this legislation is…well…huge. He is, after all, the one forced to issue IOUs in lieu of real monetary payments owed by the state to several thousand taxpayers, state contractors, and service providers.

For Democrat Chiang to agree with Republican Anderson that "if it’s good for the goose, it’s good for the gander" makes AB 1506 as credible as it is compelling. Until now, even though many legislators of both parties have jumped on board as bill co-authors, there has been a lingering question for some: "What does the Controller say about the idea? He will have to implement it." Chiang answered the question with a letter to… Read More

Adding significant muscle to a bill that appeared to have some legs already, State Controller John Chiang on Friday sent a letter to Assemblyman Joel Anderson in support of AB 1506. The Anderson legislation, a badly-needed piece of creative juice in the midst of another protracted State budget mess, would require the State of California to accept as payment its own registered warrants, otherwise known as IOUs.

Quite simply, for Controller Chiang to support this legislation is…well…huge. He is, after all, the one forced to issue IOUs in lieu of real monetary payments owed by the state to several thousand taxpayers, state contractors, and service providers.

For Democrat Chiang to agree with Republican Anderson that "if it’s good for the goose, it’s good for the gander" makes AB 1506 as credible as it is compelling. Until now, even though many legislators of both parties have jumped on board as bill co-authors, there has been a lingering question for some: "What does the Controller say about the idea? He will have to implement it." Chiang answered the question with a letter to… Read More