Those who have talked to me about it know that I have been stewing for a few weeks now about the vote of Congresswoman Mary Bono Mack in support of the national energy tax bill ("cap and trade") that narrowly passed through the House of Representatives. Astonishingly and in a most disappointing development, Republican Members of the House provided the margin of passage for what was hailed as Nancy Pelosi’s most important legislative achievement as Speaker. Because my brain is hard-wired to California politics, my angst is largely directed to Bono Mack, the only California Republican to vote for this terrible piece of legislation. The state budget crisis has provided me with a little bit of a distraction, and spared Rep. Bono Mack, thus far, of a pretty hard-hitting commentary from this website publisher.

That said, this morning I was perusing the Red County website, and came across what I would call a "must read" column from FR friend Chip Hanlon. Chip, a conservative who "gets it" has been providing solid leadership in my home county of Orange for many years, and I am pleased to say that he has started to provide some… Read More

Mr. Fleischman poses an interesting question in his post two below, specifically: Is there any statewide group out there that represents cities besides the League of California Cities? Let me attempt to answer.

Jon, although there are no other statewide groups that represent cities of which I am aware, there are a number of groups across the state that do in fact represent individual cities.

They are called city councils.

However, all too often these bodies and/or their individual members seem to march lockstep, herd mentality, with the consistent pro-tax philosophy of the "League."

All the more ironic, in that the League itself really doesn’t represent any taxpayers, at least not directly, while the city councilmembers most certainly do.

The reason I mention such heresy, is that I know there are dozens and perhaps hundreds of locally-elected city officials from throughout California that do in fact understand and realize the duplicityof a statewide association that admittedly does a pretty decent job in protecting… Read More

From today’s Wall Street Journal Political Diary E-mail…

Arnold Wins a Round

… Read More

Everyone who lives in a city or a county who drives or rides in a car (that’s about everyone) should be concerned about this. As I have previously reported, a proposal by certain representatives of the Administration has potentially misled legislators into believing it’s o.k. to vote to take the local share of the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) and Prop. 42 gas tax funds from cities and counties. The justification statement goes something like this: "Counties/Cities will be receiving American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA-federal stimulus) funds anyways — which should be more than what we will be taking from Counties". This claim is misleading, to put it mildly. Take the case of San Bernardino County alone, which stands to lose (just for its unincorporated areas), 61% of what it costs to operate and maintain2,775 miles of roads. Thatis $47 million (HUTA take) and $7 million (Prop. 42 six-month deferral). The same unincorporated areas will receive only $5.8 million in ARRA federal stimulus funds. This means they’re planning to take ten times… Read More

The state budget will be voted on this week in Sacramento. There are unlimited options available to figure out how the state can spend the billions of dollars available to provide state services in California.

As a local government official I have strong feelings about the ways that make the most sense. People certainly disagree with me on some of these things and that is fine.

I am not going to argue about how stupid it is to raid Highway User Tax Act (HUTA) funds on the basis of what these funds do. That could be the subject of a whole blog by itself.

What I will argue is that a budget based on this transfer is not wise because it may not be legal.

Voting for this budget suggests confidence that it will be used as a document of proposed spending that will last for the next fiscal year. However, that just isn’t going to happen.

Prop 5 (1974) provided cities and counties greater control over these funds. This is money that can be used to pay off local bonds but not state bonds. See Section 19 of the State Constitution.

Whatever you think about HUTA funds and the… Read More

It goes without saying that if Democrats are engaged in budget negotiations, there is going to be another clandestine effort to sneak a tax increase into the final solution.

Senate Democrats are purportedly attempting to increase the current 5 cent deposit on small containers to 10 cents. What is the big deal with a measly 5 cents?

Since the smaller containers are approximately 88% of the beverage market, this increase would result in a $980 million additional tax on consumers.

A nickel will get you a billion, which is real money in budget discussions!

The reality is that the beverage container recycling fund has become insolvent because of borrowing for the state general fund. This is an absurd consequence caused by fiscal mismanagement, which again was not the fault of taxpayers.

The Senate leadership, along with environmentalists,is proposing the10 cent deposit as a way to avoid reductions associated with the beverage fund deficits and to generate more money for their pet causes.

The voters spoke clearly on May 19th. No more taxes! That includes another nickel a drink tax on nearly every soda, juice, and water that… Read More

This is a great presentation from Dr. Sally Pipes, President of the Pacific Research Institute, which is headquartered right here in California. Anyone concerned about the health care issue should take the time to watch it… … Read More

Is it just me, or is the California Teachers Association just a body of ignorant fools? They are running ads against the Governor for "cutting education spending". I guess the same people who fail to teach our kids to read shouldn’t be faulted for not reading themselves, so let me help. California is out of money. This has been in the news now for a couple of years now, in case they missed it.

The CTA demands to be "repaid" $12 billion that they are "owed" in Prop 98 money even though public school enrollment is plummeting and the increased spending on public education since Prop 98 passed has produced almost no improvement in public education. But hey, we’ve go the highest paid teachers in the nation now!

Republicans have nothing to lose by ridiculing this band of intellectually dishonest union leaders and exposing them for what they are – an interest group that is bleeding the State dry without getting the results we need for all the extra money we’ve already invested in the black hole of public education.… Read More