Barbara Kogerman, a candidate for Laguna Hills City Council in November 2010 is promoting a term limits initiative for the city. The current city council has been in place for twenty years. Kogerman thinks that’s too long.

Laguna Hills is awell run city, not much happening there. In factthere is nothing remarkable about the city. The council is not terribly politically active.

Promoting term limits is a great way to get a name for yourself. Kogerman is taking a page out of the Larry Agran (Irvine councilmember andpolitical boss) play book that suggests building a relationship with voters on a policy level before asking for their vote. Barbara Kogerman’s husband,Lt. Col.Bill Kogerman is an Agran ally and fellow Great Park board member (the corporation that is overseeing the redevelopment of the former El Toro Marine Corps Air Station).

If the incumbents want to, they could probably fend off the insurgency. But I am not sure they have the stomach for it.… Read More

Liberals like to discuss the unfairness of California’s so-called “three strikes” criminal law. Under “three strikes,” a third criminal conviction results in substantial added incarceration of a convicted offender. Liberals think that is unfair to the civil rights of the criminal.

Conservatives say the civil rights of the victims need more consideration in law, and reason that putting repeat offenders away for longer periods reduces crime.

The relatively new book by a couple of basically liberal economists, “Superfreakeconomics,” the sequel to their earlier “Freakeconomics,” gives factual support to conservatives’ view that keeping repeaters in jail is best for society. According to their research, whenever the American Civil Liberties Union wins a criminal case that gets a violent felon out of prison, crime goes up in that area by 10% in three years. The authors have tested this and it is not just a theory, it is a fact. Anybody who doubts that the three strikes law is a good thing, needs to read “Superfreakeconomics.”… Read More

This in from longtime FR friend Andrew Pugno, who serves as General Counsel for ProtectMarriage.com…

A Vigorous Defense for Traditional Marriage By Andy Pugno, General Counsel, ProtectMarriage.com

As lawyers for the plaintiffs challenging Prop 8 neared the conclusion of their arguments and prepared to “rest their case” today, the court next turned its attention to the defense case put on by the Prop 8 Legal Team.

As lawyers for the plaintiffs challenging Prop 8 neared the conclusion of their arguments and prepared to “rest their case” today, the court next turned its attention to the defense case put on by the Prop 8 Legal Team.

But that doesn’t mean our legal defense team, while waiting our turn to present the official… Read More

This in from longtime FR friend Andrew Pugno, who serves as General Counsel for ProtectMarriage.com… A Vigorous Defense for Traditional Marriage By Andy Pugno, General Counsel, ProtectMarriage.com

As lawyers for the plaintiffs challenging Prop 8 neared the conclusion of their arguments and prepared to “rest their case” today, the court next turned its attention to the defense case put on by the Prop 8 Legal Team.

But that doesn’t mean our legal defense team, while waiting our turn to present the official defense, hasn’t been vigorously fighting to uphold Prop 8 during the plaintiffs’ case-in-chief. In fact, when the courtroom came to order this morning the time clock tells me that while plaintiffs have logged 28 hours in presenting their case, the defense team… Read More

If anyone out there had any confusion as to why we here at the FlashReport feel that labor union leaders are totally out of touch with reality, you need look no further than a recent blog post over at the ultra-leftist California Progress Report penned by Wille Pelote, Sr,, a big wheel with the California chapter of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO. We would take the time to counter Pelote’s totally crazy assertions — but we couldn’t possibly do so in a more informed and articulate manner than longtime FR friend John Kabetack, Executive Director of the National Federation of Independent Business, California…

Meg Whitman has apparently written her own book, published just in time for the election season (order it here). Her GOP primary opponent, Steve Poizner, also has a book due out shortly.

Poizner’s campaign has read Whitman’s book, and has put out their "review" in the form of the hard-hitting release below. We’ll look forward to publishing Whitman’s review of Poizner’s book when it is released.

The Poizner "critique" is fun reading for those who love the "contact sport" of politics…

In a report released today, the non-partisan Legislative Analyst’s Office called on the California Legislature to reject the Governor’s proposed constitutional amendment that would restrict the state’s spending decisions on universities and prisons.

The LAO nixed the proposal because:

1. (it) would unwisely constrain the state’s ability to allocate funding where it is most needed each year;

2. is unnecessary, as the state already had the ability to shift funding among programs without this constitutional amendment.

Read the LAO report here.

I agree with the LAO for the reasons stated and because the Governor conveniently omitted the billions of dollars California taxpayers spend on community colleges (read my blog post from Jan. 6) in an effort to skew the argument.

Even though the Legislature should reject the Governor’s proposal, that doesn’t mean we should walk away from our responsibility to trim unnecessary… Read More

Demonstrating a level of responsibility lower than that of a teenage mother who leaves an infant on the steps of a church, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation will soon be depositing unsupervised felons in neighborhoods near you.

As part of an unrelenting effort to reduce criminal sentences, eliminate parole supervision and shift its responsibilities to county law enforcement, Corrections will today commence granting early release credits (without any requirement that they be earned) and designate tens of thousands of inmates for release without parole supervision.

The unsupervised release of prisoners also absolves Corrections from any responsibility to provide parolees with training or medical care or even bus passes. From the myopic perspective of Corrections, ignoring parolees saves money. Yet ignoring offenders who have the greatest rehabilitation potential simply increases the likelihood they will fail.

Indeed, this very administration abandoned its prior policy of ignoring parole violations in 2005 when the Sacramento Bee published an in-depth article that documented a dramatic increase of new felonies among parolees whose… Read More