Notice: Undefined index: file in /srv/www/blog.flashreport.org/releases/20130218155602/wp-includes/media.php on line 1676

This time they’ve gone too far.

Many Californians, and people across the country, were left shaking their heads in disbelief when they learned about the new law the California Legislature enacted mandating that any student be given access to sensitive school facilities like showers, bathrooms and locker rooms reserved for the opposite sex based on a claim that the student “identifies” with the opposite gender. It’s the only law like it ever enacted by a Legislature anywhere in the country.

A new poll conducted by SmithJohnson Research for the Privacy For All Students coalition shows that voters strongly oppose this law and are very likely to flush it if given the opportunity. (Sorry, I couldn’t’ resist.) The poll found that only 35% of voters support the new law, while 51% oppose it.

The encouraging news pointing to voter rejection of the law is despite an obvious attempt by California Attorney General Kamala Harris to bias voters in favor of a vote to approve it. She gave the referendum the title of, “Overturns non-discrimination requirements for school programs and activities.”

It’s certainly encouraging that voters see through… Read More

Clearly Democrats in San Diego are worried about their future. With their leader recently being forced out office amidst a sex scandal that received international attention, Democrats are looking for any avenue whereby they can keep hold of the Mayor’s office. And in their efforts, they have already launched a hateful smear campaign against the Republican they fear most. Their target is former Councilman Carl DeMaio, an openly gay Republican who ran against Bob Filner for Mayor in 2012.

After his unsuccessful campaign in 2012, DeMaio,, an advocate for accountability and transparency in government, continues to provide leadership in San Diego on those issues. But seeing that he could have a large voice on issues of importance to taxpayers, he announced his candidacy for Congress. But now fast-forward to the Bob Filner scandal and resignation. Many pundits had thought Carl… Read More

Notice: Undefined index: file in /srv/www/blog.flashreport.org/releases/20130218155602/wp-includes/media.php on line 1676

“Whatever Labor wants, Labor gets.”

That’s an actual quote from my colleague Senator Leland Yee of San Francisco during a recent labor rally. It sums up what Flash Report readers should expect over the next four days before the Legislature adjourns for the year.

There are approximately 400 bills left – some may be held over until next year, but we’ll be working late this week to consider most of them. Big labor, anti-public safety advocates and trial lawyers are counting on the ruling party to do their bidding this week. Taxpayers, small business owners and working families have the most to lose. Here’s what to keep an eye on, and yes they’re all authored by Democrats:

SB 25 by Senator Steinberg makes it easier for unions to force an employer to adopt a collective bargaining agreement. It’s a “surgical strike” against the agricultural industry. Some farm owners have said this bill could destroy their business, cost thousands of farmworker jobs and force hundreds of California farmers to shut down. The ruling party wants to make it more difficult for agriculture to operate in California, which will drive up the cost of… Read More

We’ve decided to kick off a new feature here on the FlashReport to help our readers get to know the non-incumbent Republican candidates running for Congress around California. Entitled, “Where They Stand,” this periodic feature will allow us to throw a question out credible GOP candidates running in either an open “safe R” seat or seeking to challenge an incumbent Democrat in a competitive district. The question will typically be something up for a vote in Congress, so that these folks can weigh in on the public debate.

We sent the first question to Igor Birman, Elizabeth Emken and Doug Ose in CD 7, Tony Strickland in CD 26, Assemblyman Brian Nestande in CD 36, Pat Maciariello, Supervisor John Moorlach, and State Senator Mimi Walters in CD 45, and Carl DeMaio and Kik Jorgensen in CD 52. All the candidates responded except for Strickland, whose campaign indicated that they would participate in the future.

The first question that we have posed to the candidates, with 300 words or less to answer, was: If you were in Congress now, based on the information you have available to you, would you vote for a resolution… Read More

It’s somewhat ironic, really. The California Coastal Commission (Commission) wants to upend the process for penalizing property owners it says are eroding our coastal resources by – wait for it – eroding due process rights for those same property owners.

For several years the Commission has sought to expand its enforcement authority greatly by allowing it to impose penalties and fines for violations of the Coastal Act instead of having to impose them through the independent judicial process. This year, with Friday’s passage of Assembly Bill 976… Read More

Even for those who aren’t in the market, it’s hard to ignore all the news about rising home prices. According to the California Association of Realtors, median home prices are up nearly 30 percent over just the last year. California has not seen this big of a one year increase since 1977 when it jumped 28.1 percent.

But the huge increase in values in 1977 brought as much anger and fear as anything else because that was just before voters overwhelmingly approved Proposition 13 to rein in out of control property taxes. Those taxes were going up as fast as home prices and forcing many from their homes.

Under the pre-Proposition 13 system, homeowners shuddered in fear when their tax bill arrived because it would be based on what someone else was willing to pay for a home like theirs, not on what they had paid or could afford. Those whose property values were increased by hyperinflation in the housing market were treated as if they were now “rich guys” who should be taxed on their “paper profits.” But those who were committed to homeownership were seeing no benefit. If they… Read More

Notice: Undefined index: file in /srv/www/blog.flashreport.org/releases/20130218155602/wp-includes/media.php on line 1676

The California Congressional House delegation of 53 representatives includes experienced national security hands like Republican Committee Chairmen “Buck” McKeon (Armed Services) and Ed Royce (Foreign Affairs), as well as former Reagan administration official Dana Rohrbacher and U.S. military veterans Darrell Issa, Duncan Hunter, Jr. and Paul Cook.

On the Democrat side there are some freshman with quite limited foreign policy bona fides, while the two longtime U.S. Senators from California have frequently voted along Democrat party lines and can be expected to continue that path.

As they all consider the resolutions this week on Capitol Hill, the California delegation might reach some rare, broadly bi-partisan consensus in opposing the legislation to authorize an immediate use of force in Syria.

I propose a yellow light on Syria: caution until the U.S. adopts a strategic plan with achievable objectives, some semblance of an allied coalition to share in the mission and to support the U.S. in the Gulf, and more understanding by and support from the American people.

President Obama is playing a losing hand. Instead of acting against Syrian… Read More

Short answer to the question above — probably legal, BUT . . . .

Turns out that the Qualcomm job that Nathan Fletcher landed after his run for mayor in 2012 reportedly pays an absurdly high amount — $400,000 a year. That would provide a comfortable monthly cash flow ($33,333.33 gross/month) while Fletcher was waiting to (formally) run again for mayor of San Diego.

Fletcher’s job at Qualcomm? Reputedly he was paid to hobnob for the company, “sit on boards” and to give a couple “Rah-rah Qualcomm” speeches — and arguably to informally run for mayor.

His experience for this Qualcomm job? Essentially nonexistent. And apparently he seldom showed up at work, though this aspect is contested (see the story below).

One aspect that most are forgetting is the tax angle. If you contribute money to a candidate, it’s not tax deductible (unless you are a labor union member and itemize — it’s technically not legal to deduct union dues used for politics, but most do it). Also, a “donor” is usually severely limited as to the amount they can give to a candidate.

But if you… Read More