Posted by Jon Fleischman at 12:00 am on Oct 31, 2006 3 Comments
I am really not sure of exactly how the California Republican
Party’s voter guide came out with omissions of party positions, and
inclusion of positive statements about measures on which the party
has no position.
The whole thing is troubling and it leaves one to conclude that
somebody or somebodies made some subjective calls about which party
positions were really important versus which ones were not.
Now what criteria were used to determine what was left off, or what
should have been left off that was actually included eludes
me. Was it based on what interests had money and which ones
did not? Because often times political parties will take
principled positions for or against ballot measures, knowing that
the position of the party may not have a financially well-off ally
to help promote that position.
Anyways, in the California Republican Party voter guide, there
is an entire page devoted to why Proposition 1D, the so-called
Education Bonds, are a good idea. When it actually came to
someone’s attention that the CRP membership did not vote to endorse
1D, instead of scrapping the mailing (which would have been a very
expensive proposition),… Read More