Get free daily email updates

Syndicate this site - RSS

Recent Posts

Blogger Menu

Click here to blog

Jon Fleischman

Leonard: State GOP needs to look at what did and did not work in the V6 program to plan for future…

With a shout out to GOP Board of Equalization Member Bill Leonard’s blog, we ‘lift’ (with encouragement to check out his blog) the following posted by Leonard today, which is worth reading and thinking about…

A state Democrat blog last week had this headline: “CDP Field Operation Defeats $20 Million GOP Elephant.” Indeed, as the above results show, statewide Republican candidates did not fare well. Yet the CRP and the Governor had touted this year’s Victory ’06 effort as the end-all, be-all of voter identification and activation. I had been excited about it. I saw what microtargeting accomplished for the President in Ohio two years ago and was eager to replicate that success in California. That excitement faded as results were tallied.

Accusations have been flying that the CRP’s Victory ’06 was actually Arnold ’06, Period. I have heard that the CRP’s phone banks used scripts written by and for the Governor, leaving the rest of the ticket unmentioned. There are rumors that there was mischief with CRP door-hangars because the Governor and the party disagreed over ballot measures. There is concern that the Victory ’06 GOTV effort focused on voters who may not even have been Republicans.

At this point, such accusations remain just that: undocumented statements with a tinge of bitterness following a brutal defeat of most of the party ticket. Therefore, what is needed is full disclosure by the CRP leadership, a detailed political audit of how this campaign was waged. The party members, donors and volunteers deserve to know the full truth and the actual numbers. Specifically, how did the CRP spend $20 million? How many voters were contacted, by whom, where were they, and what message was delivered to them? Can we identify why some of our biggest GOP counties appear to have had a much lower GOP turnout than usual? Did the party organizations there rely on Victory ’06 to turn-out the base instead of their usual, grassroots effort? This Dem blog said the CDP “contacted 521,622 voters and personally visited 424,354 homes to seek their support of the Democratic Ticket.” What are the CRP’s numbers, and can we honestly say that contact from the CRP included support for the Republican ticket?

3 Responses to “Leonard: State GOP needs to look at what did and did not work in the V6 program to plan for future…”

  1. davidduran@gmx.net Says:

    Also, how much of the $20 million was used to hire temporary workers to make GOTV calls even though they couldn’t read English or pronounce the word “Republican”? Just curious…

  2. alexburrolagop@yahoo.com Says:

    Hey, the genius who came up with ignoring Prop. 90 and Dick Mountjoy is sure a winner.

  3. pkskelton@aol.com Says:

    Turnout 2006 vs 2002

    Riverside: 49.4 / 47.7
    San Bernadino 45.0 / 47.7
    Ventura 53.9 / 48.3
    Kern 51.9 / 53.1
    Orange 50.3 / 49.4
    San Diego 57.0 / 48.3
    Fresno 54.0 / 45.0
    San Joaquin 50.1 / 49.9

    Statewide 53.8 / 49.6

    Conclusion: Turnout in base Republican couties was basically the same as in 2002, a little higher insome places, a little lower in others.

    Turnout was not your problem. Your problem was that voters were not buying what you were selling.