I have been in elected office for 10 years now. And of those 10 years, I have spent half of that time in the California State Legislature and the other half here in Congress. During that time, I have found that a common thread exists amongst elected Democrats. At least part of the reason they ran for and are in office now is to raise taxes on somebody or everybody and then spend that money on people and programs which they deem worthy. A fundamental tenet of the Democratic Party today is that government should tax more and spend more on lots of things.
But that ideology has just run headlong into political reality. Polling shows that one of the top two issues on the minds of Americans these days is the debt and the deficit. The other big issue is jobs and the economy. And Americans realize that the two are related. They understand that our crushing debt burden, up 81% since Democrats took over Congress in 2006, is one of the drags on the economy. So, spending money that increases the deficit and the debt even further is not very popular right now. And of course, there is an election in just over 4 months.
So, if you want to spend new money without earning the rancor of the public, you need to either cut other spending by an equivalent amount or raise taxes by an equivalent amount. Raising taxes is never popular. But it’s particularly unpopular after you’ve just raised them by trillions of dollars in a very public and unpopular health care bill. And because of the ideology described above, cutting other spending is very difficult within the Democratic Caucus because there are constituencies for every dollar currently being spent, and those constituencies don’t want to see it reduced. So, Democrats can’t agree to do it.
Hence the Democrat’s dilemma. They want to spend more money on lots of things. They think that the only way to create jobs is to have the government spend more in order to create more government jobs. But they don’t want to vote for more deficit spending. They don’t want to cut any other spending. And, although they would like to raise taxes, they fear the ire of the voters in November if they do. That’s why they won’t pass a budget in the House this year for the first time since 1974. They want to spend the money, but they don’t want to vote to spend the money.
This is resulting in a form of gridlock here in D.C. as Democrats struggle to marshal the votes amongst Democrats for more spending programs knowing that no Republican will support any of this. Heretofore, Speaker Pelosi has always gotten her way. But it is getting more difficult as the debt rises and the elections loom. Just this week, Majority Leader Hoyer (D-MD) announced that Democrats may not be able to adhere to President Obama’s pledge to not raise taxes on families earning below $250,000. Although, it should be noted that this pledge has already been broken on several occasions, it was nonetheless quite interesting to see him admit that there are more taxes to come which will impact everyone. This is a clear signal that given the choice between no new spending, or cutting existing spending to pay for new programs, the Democrats are likely to choose neither and instead add on more and more tax increases or deficit spending or both.
They can’t help themselves. It’s why they came to Congress. But it’s the wrong thing at the wrong time. We can create jobs and lift the economy by cutting taxes and cutting spending and giving the private sector some certainty that if they take risks and succeed they will be rewarded and not punished. But this majority will never go there.
So, we will all be better off for the time being if all these tax and spend ideas just die.
July 2nd, 2010 at 12:00 am
John says
“So, we will all be better off for the time being if all these tax and spend ideas just die. ”
This is a great concept… but lets examine further how we got to this point of economic folly
John says
“A fundamental tenet of the Democratic Party today is that government should tax more and spend more on lots of things. ”
When have Elected Republicans called for less Federal or State revenue than the year before when they where in the majority or had the power to stop it ??? (not revenue neutral or increasing revenue)
How many deficit or gimmick budgets did GHW Bush , GW Bush, Arnold Kennedy or…. out right Veto & force Congress or the Leg. to submit a true balanced budget with no gimmicks ?
Or do politicians get weak kneed when doing the right thing might jeopardize their own political carriers ?
Or voted down or advocated against borrowing or deficit spending ( the Ca 15 billion $ revenue bonds of 2004 come to mind, not to mention how long the congress has been deficit spending )
Unless you take away the $$$ from gubMint (borrowing,taxes, printing…) they will increase there strangle hold on Power
To Curb the Federales, State & Local gubMints power …. GDP of 28% for the Federales & 14% for State & Local gubMints (a whopping 42% of GDP ) must be decreased substantially for there to be real sustained economic growth
Its easy to against stuff when your the minority party
It takes real leadership to do the right thing when you are given by the citizens the votes to make the tough choices and let political consequences fall where they may
History will ultimately prove if you where right in your actions , so politicians of true integrity & character will always do what’s right & not worry about what is said about them or how they vote at any particular time
John you may want to blame it all on the Democrats ?
I submit to you that your position that it’s all the Dems fault is intellectually dishonest
IMO While the Democrats share 50% of the blame (politically)
The Republicans also share 50% of the blame (politically) for the economic folly we find ourselves in today
We as Citizens have 100% of the blame for electing Representatives that have put these policies in place because these policies have been instituted by Rep & Dems (unless you know of some one else ?) … and we by & large keep reelecting incumbents & party hacks 98.7 % of the time