If I owned the Los Angeles Times and could even the score with the Brown campaign’s and that newspaper’s terrible treatment and lies about Meg Whitman, I’d get one of my reporters to ask Jerry Brown this question: “Are you addicted to cocaine?” When Brown refused to answer the question because it is stupid question to ask, I’d publish a big headline in the Times “Brown refuses to Answer Question about cocaine addiction”. Then when Brown eventually would say he was not addicted to cocaine, I would write another headline, “Brown admits not addicted to cocaine”. The deceptive headlines over baloney stories such as the housekeeper story simply show how far Brown and his media flunkies are willing to go to avoid what really needs to be discussed in this campaign: the government employee union stranglehold on policy in Sacramento. These powerful unions are bankrupting not only the state with their huge pensions, they are also bankrupting the future of our state by producing the poorest performing generation of students in California history. While Brown and the SF Chronicle and LA Times wallow in a message about one disgruntled employee who lied to her employer, the rest of us are denied discussion of the issues of genuine public interest. But don’t expect these papers to write a headline saying “Newspapers admit slanted story coverage in Governor’s race.”
October 2nd, 2010 at 12:00 am
Well if we want candidates to talk about important subjects, let’s ask why Meg Whitman is for gun control (she is, she’s said so, she can’t backtrack) – and why the large population of single-issue CA gunnies would remotely consider voting for her.
The CA Republicans have a lot to make up for by promoting yet another antigunner.
Bill Wiese
San Jose CA
October 2nd, 2010 at 12:00 am
Never in history have two so flawed candidates on major policy matters been served up to the electorate….if you feel like a docile possum in the headlights….at least vote for spunky Globalist Carly….she has spirit, how bout you!!!
October 5th, 2010 at 12:00 am
much akin to your idea, there are signs here on Genesee Ave. that have as a bold statement: what does whitman have to hide? and then a couple of other bullet points. I saw no attribution on them, and they really look like what your post talks about; simply raise a question with no apparent answer. sneaky tactics, and below the belt. boy I’ll be glad when this election is over.