We can debate exactly what caused the near economic collapse in the fall of 2008, but clearly over leveraging and excessive risk taking by consumers, banks, and “non-banks” was a major contributor. The economy continues to have a drag caused by deleveraging and fallout from the losses incurred during that period. The U.S. Federal government prevented that collapse by putting the imprimatur of the United States Treasury on a lot of private debt in order to stop the run. It worked because the world markets had a tremendous level of trust in the full faith and credit of the United States government.
But the shoe may soon be on the other foot. Federal spending as a percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is now over 25%. The last time the government represented that much of the economy, we were building B-29 bombers to drop their payloads on Japan and Germany. As a result of the economic downturn, taxes collected are only about 15% of GDP (whereas 19% has roughly been the average for the last 40 years) hence the huge deficits.
And that’s only the federal government. State and local governments now comprise (roughly) an additional 10% of GDP. So combined, government at all levels in this country now account for over 1/3 of economic activity in the country. I happen to think that this is way too much but we can debate that point at another time. The point here is that government at all levels now represent a much larger part of the economy than they ever have before, outside of a World or Civil War.
And the government is in trouble. I wrote you last week about the sheer unsustainability of the current federal spending, deficit, and debt levels. But as you all know, the State of California has serious budget problems of its own, as do probably 30 other states. There is trouble in Mudville at the local level as well. Former Mayor Dick Riordan recently said that he believes that the City of Los Angeles will soon have to declare bankruptcy.
While the private sector is rapidly shedding risk, debt, and leverage, the public sector is increasing the same. Now, government at all levels is broadly overleveraged, has too much debt, and too much risk without adequate reserves. Some of this is from simple current overspending. But some of it is also from promises that can’t be kept on government worker pensions, Medicare, other entitlements, and even some infrastructure projects. This can’t continue. Even if you felt that this spending was the right policy, government literally can’t raise taxes enough to pay for all that it is currently spending plus all it has promised to spend in the future. Something’s got to give.
Therein lies the problem. If we continue on our merry, free-wheeling government way, at some point government will no longer be able to sell its debt, except at very high rates. Think Greece or Portugal here. The U.S. government rescued the economy in 2008. But governments here may require a rescue of their own in the future. The government’s problems are, potentially, the biggest impediment to future economic growth as this huge segment of the economy gets rationalized. Obviously, the severity of the impact will be determined by the policy choices that are made in the near future. Doing nothing is, in my opinion, the worst possible choice, which is followed closely by little reform with lots of taxes. But no matter what those choices are, it’s not going to be pretty.
February 22nd, 2010 at 12:00 am
For someone that voted to give away a trillion dollars via your aye vote for the TARP bailout bill, I find this hand wringing of yours over the current over spending as crocodile tears.