I have been scanning the internet, looking for someone to put into words how I feel about all of this talk of a Federal Bailout of Wall Street — and (predictably) I found it at the Club for Growth. I have no kind words for President Bush or his agent, Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson (who probably stands to personally lose tens of millions if not more without a bailout) in this matter — that this kind of massive redistribution of wealth is being proposed by a Republican President is…shameful:
Club for Growth Condemns Federal Bailout
Government Intervention is not the Answer
Eighteen months into the credit crunch, many largely capitalized financial services firms are experiencing serious difficulties but the overall economy continues to grow. GDP growth over the past 12 months was 2.25 percent and 3.5 percent when excluding the drag imposed by the housing sector. Even within the financial sector, many banks are doing well. Regional bank indices had risen significantly since the lows of last July—prior to the bailout announcement—and thousands of community banks are thriving. It is extraordinary that a massive government intervention in the economy is considered inevitable when the economy is not even in a recession.
At the same time, socializing economic risks come at a great cost to the American economy by misallocating capital, inviting political manipulation, and putting taxpayers on the hook for possibly a trillion dollars. Such a large takeover by the government will surely be accompanied by adverse, unintended consequences. Already, other companies and industries are lining up at government’s door asking for their own bailout. And if the government incurs $700 billion in debt to finance the purchase of bad bank assets, the danger that it will eventually monetize that debt and trigger dramatic inflation is very worrisome.
“The Treasury’s bailout proposal will likely cause more harm than good,” said Club for Growth President Pat Toomey. “Instead of launching the largest government bailout since the Great Depression, the government should be implementing policies to stimulate the economy. These include, at a minimum, cutting the tax on capital gains, cutting corporate taxes, reviewing and considering repeal of FAS 57 which requires banks to mark-to-market most securities, and emphasizing the need for a strong dollar.”
“Finally, many politicians are using the current struggle to make free-market capitalism the scapegoat for the economy’s troubles, when in fact, government played a major role in getting us into this mess in the first place. Free-market capitalism is alive and well, and we should be embracing its tenets, not rejecting them.”
September 22nd, 2008 at 12:00 am
Thank goodness someone is speaking out against this travesty! This is the socialization of our government in one week! Everyone should be calling their congressmen and demanding they vote NO on this bailout.
September 22nd, 2008 at 12:00 am
Down here in OC, all GOP Congressmen are onboard for the bailout except for Dana Rohrabacher and possibly Darrell Issa. John Campbell, Gary Miller, and Ken Calvert are all “aye” votes already according to statements they have put out. It really makes me sick to my stomach to see so many Republicans shunning free markets and embracing socialism.
September 23rd, 2008 at 12:00 am
Allan Bartlett wrote:
“It really makes me sick to my stomach to see so many Republicans shunning free markets and embracing socialism.”
THAT is why the GOP was thrown out by the voters in ’06, and why those Republicans who haven’t embraced socialism will have such a hard sell this year.
The socialist wing of the GOP must be openly condemned as being antithetical to conservatism and American values.