Get free daily email updates

Syndicate this site - RSS

Recent Posts

Blogger Menu

Click here to blog

Ray Haynes

Today’s Commentary: A Permanent Minority?

It is never a good thing to talk about elections in the middle of an election.  I already know that, if there are responses to what I write, they will be mostly ad hominem.  The conservative movement, however, is worth the criticism.  As a political force, the conservative movement is dying in California, and it is dying because too many of our conservative leaders have allowed their personal agendas to trump the principles they claim to espouse.

Let me first explain what I mean.  I don’t count consultants as conservative leaders.  They will pick up the cause of whoever writes the check.  One problem is that too many activists confuse consultants with principle.  They believe that political consultants actually believe in more than the fifteen per cent they collect from their clients.  The fact is that consultants serve candidates or their pocketbook, not causes.  They are an important part of the political process but they cannot drive it.  They have to feed their family first, and that need too often trumps principle.  They are the tacticians, they are not the leaders.  The two cannot be confused if we ever wish to create a majority.  

Political leaders do set the agenda, they determine the principles to follow.  Politicians are entrusted by the people who follow them with power and influence because they promise to pursue the principles they espouse.  When those politicians confuse their personal agenda with principle, they are in fact betraying the people who have entrusted them with power. 

Unfortunately, in too many elections, in too many places, we are watching our leaders subvert principle in pursuit of a personal agenda.  Case in point, the Mimi Walters campaign for Senate in Orange County.  I sat next to Mimi for two years in the Assembly.   In every way, and at every turn, Mimi demonstrated her conservative leadership.  Whether the issue was illegal immigration, property rights, taxes, size of government, or individual freedom, Mimi stepped up to the plate to fight for conservative principles.  In fact, between Mimi, me, Chuck DeVore, and Doug LaMalfa, we used to refer to our part of the Assembly floor as the Bermuda Quadrangle.  When it came time to oppose bills, the four of us would do take the lead.  No one (except for me of course) had a better voting record on the issues important to conservatives, the movement, and, of course, California.  In my opinion, today, she is critically important to the conservative movement over the long term.  An articulate, intelligent, conservative woman in the State Senate is necessary for the long term health of our movement, and I know I can trust Mimi to set a solid conservative agenda, and pursue it for the right reasons.

**There is more – click the link**

View Full Commentary

6 Responses to “Today’s Commentary: A Permanent Minority?”

  1. soldsoon@aol.com Says:

    Prophets often suffer in the wilderness. They also return and perform magnificant deeds!

  2. chrissjordan@excite.com Says:

    To Mr. Haynes.

    I’m sure you are familiar with Morton Blackwell’s qoute “You can’t change the world if you can’t pay the rent.” Sticking with conservative principles in California seem to be at odds with that notion. (The fact that consultants cross party lines all the time, is but a symptom of that.) How can this gordion knot be resolved?

  3. marvin@garlic.com Says:

    If we cannot put our personal agendas aside, we soon will not have 1/3 the memberts in the Assembly or senate. That would be desister.

  4. soldsoon@aol.com Says:

    Thats it boys roll over…do you see Israel rolling over to tyranny and opression…did Regan roll over to the greatest threat to peace in history?

    YOU WILL EVENTUALLY WIN….good prevails over evil…

  5. bill@bwiese.org Says:

    Tom,

    While what you write is true, much of CA Republicans’ problems center around their poor marketing. Much of it is the leadership’s fault. While individual candidates can make it in ‘safe’ districts, they can’t make it to statewide office.

    They need to stop talking about choice/right-to-life for several election cycles, and need to keep quiet about religion and “families”. If they stick to their guns about spending, government effectiveness, and job creation they can get their position back although it’s been horribly damaged now.

    These issues scare middle-ground voters suburban homeowner demographic enough that they’re willing to pay higher taxes by voting Democrat.

    Bill Wiese
    San Jose CA

  6. cheektocheek@juno.com Says:

    Honorable Mr. Haynes,

    I’ve long been an admirer of yours but when you broke from Tom McClintock during the recall to endorse the “Debtinator”, I was appalled. It seems that you exemplified everything you accuse Harry Sidhu supporters of being. The difference is, however, that Harry is also a conservative (along with the perfectly supportable Ms. Walters). Schwarzenegger fails the test. Your betrayal of the individual who might have been one of California’s great Governors still grates. I guess that the difference is that I would still support you for your fine record of votes. McClintock should have been able to count on your support!