SCOTUS to CA: Juries, not Judges, determine Facts!
On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that California’s Determinant Sentencing Law (DSL) was unconstitutional. The current DSL allows a trial court judge to determine issues of fact during the sentencing hearing for the purpose of establishing aggravating and mitigating factors. The judge can then use these factors in establishing whether a criminal defendant should get the short, medium, or long sentence as established by current sentencing guidelines. In short, the Court reasoned that allowing the judge to determine issues of fact violates a defendant’s 6th Amendment right. The net consequence of the Court’s ruling will very likely be reduced sentences of some of California’s most violent criminals.
As such, Assemblyman Todd Spitzer, a longtime advocate for all things public safety, and I will be introducing legislation to remedy the constitutionally invalid process. While the “fix” probably is not as complicated as some would have us believe, the process to get there is likely to meet with much political positioning. In particular,… Read More