Get free daily email updates

Syndicate this site - RSS

Recent Posts

Blogger Menu

Click here to blog

Jon Fleischman

Today’s Commentary: AG race – A tale of two primaries, one credible, one not.

THREE AND A HALF CONTENDERS FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL
I am a huge fan of contested primaries.  I think that the whole argument that a candidate is better off because they have "cleared the field" is a misnomer and misplaced.  Of course the challenge of winning a party primary means that resources will need to be raised and spent in order to do so.  But it is this process that makes a candidate the best they can be for the general election.  A primary hones a candidates speaking skills and fundraising skills.  A primary allows a candidate to understand who really supports them.  A primary also causes candidates to have to make some very real decisions and choices that allow party members to appreciate the candidate who becomes their nominee.  I think the same holds true whether we are talking about candidate for the Democrat or Republican nomination.
 
Arnold Schwarzenegger is a stronger candidate for re-election this year because of his strong contest with Tom McClintock in the recall election.  The ultimate winner of the Angelides v. Westly battle will be a stronger candidate going into the general election for having fought for the Democratic nomination.
 
When we look at the race for Attorney General, there are two contested primaries taking place — one is quite vigorous, and the other apparently nominal, but both will help produce stronger candidates for the November election.

**There is more – click the link**

View Full Commentary